Monday, October 31, 2016

Public’s view of berry recall blocked by corporate consideration

illustration strawberry distribution chain less than transparentA vague link in the supply chain is blurring the public’s view of a recall of frozen strawberries from Egypt that are blamed for infecting at least 134 people across nine states in an ongoing Hepatitis A outbreak.

The Egyptian company that produced, processed and exported the fruit is recalling all of the frozen strawberries it sent to the U.S. since Jan. 1 this year. However, government and corporate officials will not say how many tons of strawberries are implicated, who imported them, or what percentage of them are accounted for — or unaccounted for — in the nationwide distribution chain.

“We do not distribute them in the United States,” an official with International Company for Agricultural Production & Processing (ICAPP) said Monday afternoon.

“And while we’re working closely with the FDA to ensure that the supply of frozen strawberries exported to the U.S. are safe and healthy, we do not yet have complete information about downstream distribution.”

Officials with the Food and Drug Administration posted the Egyptian company’s recall notice Monday, but are barred by corporate confidentiality clauses in federal law from revealing the company’s customers or volumes of strawberries involved.

At least one restaurant chain, Tropical Smoothie Cafe, received some of the strawberries from ICAPP’s Egyptian fields and facilities. Virginia public health officials linked the Hepatitis A outbreak to strawberry smoothies in early August.

The restaurant chain pulled the Egyptian strawberries from all of its locations, but Tropical Smoothie Cafe customers concentrated in Virginia and nearby states had already been infected. Of the 134 victims, 107 are Virginia residents.

Distribution details and defendants
The statement from the Egyptian producer/exporter suggested only one distributor is involved in the U.S.

“We are working with our U.S. distributor to collect this information and will respond to your questions as soon as we can. We have full confidence that the recall is proceeding effectively.”

An FDA spokesman expressed similar optimism about the status of the recall, as did a spokesman with Sysco Corp., the largest broadline supplier to foodservice operators in the United States.

“In an abundance of caution, Sysco immediately halted shipments and placed all frozen strawberries with a Country of Origin of Egypt on hold on Aug. 19, as soon as questions were raised regarding its quality,” the spokesman for Houston-based Sysco said Monday.

logo ICAPP Egypt strawberries“On Oct. 27, ICAPP issued a recall of this product. We subsequently communicated this action to our facilities and customers, in an abundance of caution and despite the fact that we have not been distributing the product involved in the recall since August, so that our customers could ensure that they did not have any affected product in their inventories.”

While FDA officials cannot reveal certain distribution information because of corporate confidentiality laws, the agency did report Monday that the implicated frozen strawberries were not offered for retail sale direct to consumers.

“ICAPP’s recalled frozen strawberries were distributed to food service establishments nationwide,” according to FDA’s outbreak update.

“The FDA’s investigation in connection with this outbreak identified five samples of ICAPP’s frozen strawberries that tested positive for Hepatitis A.”

The Egyptian company, and government, have reported their tests have not returned any positive results for the highly contagious virus.

FDA officials have contacted the Egyptian International Health Regulations National Focal Point to discuss the investigation, but have not reported and details on what Egyptian authorities have said or what that country is doing to determine the root cause of the Hepatitis A contamination.

In its recall notice, the Egyptian producer/exporter reported it is cooperating with U.S. officials.

“ICAPP has been engaged with FDA in its investigation of this outbreak and is taking this action in consultation with FDA because Hepatitis A virus was detected in four lots of frozen strawberries that were exported to the U.S. by ICAPP,” according to the recall.

Civil lawsuits filed by outbreak victims have named as defendants Tropical Smoothie Cafe and the following companies in the supply chain: JMG Enterprises Inc. of Great Falls, VA; Sysco Corp. of Houston; Sysco Hampton Roads Inc. of Houston; Sysco VA LLC of Harrisonburg, VA; Sysco Merchandising and Supply Chain Services Inc. of Houston; International Traders Inc. of Rocky Mount, NC; Patagonia Foods LLC of San Luis Obispo, CA; and VLM Foods USA Inc. of Plattsburgh, NY.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2eu5n6u

Egyptian firm recalls some frozen strawberries for Hepatitis A

logo ICAPP Egypt strawberriesThe International Company for Agricultural Production & Processing (ICAPP), based in Ramadan City, Egypt, is voluntarily recalling certain lots of its frozen strawberries in response to the ongoing investigation into a multistate outbreak of Hepatitis A in the United States.

The Food and Drug Administration’s recall announcement, dated Sunday, Oct. 30, stated that the company’s action was taken in consultation with FDA because the Hepatitis A virus was detected in four lots of frozen strawberries ICAPP exported to the U.S.

The federal agency added that ICAPP is working closely with all of its distributors in this country to make sure that the recall is effective.

FDA issued an Import Alert for the company’s strawberries on Oct. 19, indicating that the frozen berries would not be admitted into the U.S. However, at the time the agency did not specifically connect the product to the Hepatitis A outbreak that has been linked to smoothies served at Tropical Smoothie Café outlets.

However, FDA’s latest update on the investigation, posted Oct. 20, notes the following: “Nearly all ill people interviewed report eating smoothies containing strawberries at Tropical Smoothie locations in a limited geographic area. Preliminary traceback information indicates that the frozen strawberries served in these Tropical Smoothie Café locations were imported from Egypt. Tropical Smoothie Café has stopped using these strawberries nationwide.”

http://ift.tt/1x4ZP6uAs of Oct. 17, the Hepatitis A outbreak had sickened 134 people from nine states (Arkansas, California, Maryland, North Carolina, New York, Oregon, Virginia, Wisconsin and West Virginia), according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. No deaths have been reported in connection with the outbreak, although 52 people have been hospitalized.

FDA noted in the Oct. 30 recall announcement that the lots of frozen Egyptian strawberries were all distributed for sale to, and use in, foodservice establishments nationwide and not for use in food products offered for retail sale to consumers.

Even so, the agency added that ICAPP was “issuing this news release publicly to help mitigate any possible risk to the public health and to fully ensure that all recalled products are recovered.”

“Although none of ICAPP’s own testing through an established surveillance program or through third party testing of retained samples has identified the presence of Hepatitis A in any of its products, ICAPP has decided to recall all frozen strawberries that it has imported into the United States since January 1, 2016 out of an abundance of caution,” according to the recall announcement.

No other ICAPP products, frozen or fresh, are covered by this voluntary recall, FDA added.

The recall announcement stated that the Egyptian company is conducting a comprehensive review of all of its operations and suppliers to make sure that the food it produces is safe.

For questions or more information about the recall, consumers may contact ICAPP by email at customerservice@icapp.com.eg, or by phone, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Cairo local time (six hours ahead of ET), at +201-541-1624.

frozenstrawberries_406x250Under the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), FDA has mandatory recall authority, but the agency must first provide the responsible party with a chance to stop distribution and conduct a voluntary recall of the food item in question.

If the responsible party refuses to, or does not voluntarily, cease distribution or recall the food item within the time and in the manner prescribed by FDA, the agency may proceed with a mandatory recall.

Hepatitis A is a contagious liver disease that results from exposure to the Hepatitis A virus. It is usually transmitted by the fecal-oral route, either through person-to-person contact or through consumption of contaminated food or water.

It can range from a mild illness lasting a few weeks to a serious illness lasting several months. Illness generally occurs within 15 to 50 days of exposure and includes fatigue, abdominal pain, jaundice, abnormal liver tests, dark urine and pale stool.

Hepatitis A vaccination can prevent illness if given within two weeks of exposure to a contaminated food. In rare cases, particularly for those who have a pre-existing severe illness or are immune-compromised, Hepatitis A infection can progress to liver failure.

Persons who may have consumed the recalled product should consult with their health care professional or local health department to determine if a vaccination is appropriate, and anyone with symptoms of Hepatitis A should contact their health care provider or a local health department immediately.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2e5FCIJ

Sunday, October 30, 2016

Recall of Mr. Christie’s baby biscuits expands; consumers sick

To see additional photos of the packaging for the recalled Mr. Christie's biscuits, click on the image.

To see additional photos of the packaging for the recalled Mr. Christie’s biscuits, click on the image.

A recall expansion in Canada targets cookies specifically marketed for babies just beginning to consume solid food. The Mr. Christie’s brand arrowroot biscuits were first recalled Oct. 21 after consumers reported illnesses after eating them.

The recall expansion, posted Friday by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, did not provide any additional details about the reported illnesses. It repeated the advice to consumers to seek medical attention if they or their infants become ill after consuming the cookies.

“Consumers should not consume the recalled products described below. If you think you became sick from consuming a recalled product, call your doctor,” the CFIA notice states.

“Check to see if you have recalled products in your home. Recalled products should be thrown out or returned to the store where they were purchased.

The company initiated the recall Oct. 21 after reports of illnesses and an off taste. The CFIA is conducting an investigation. The Mr. Christie’s Arrowroot Biscuits were distributed to retailers nationwide by Mondelēz Canada of the multinational snack company Mondelēz International Inc.

Specific products added to the recall are:

 

Brand Name Common Name Size Code(s) on Product UPC
Mr. Christie’s   Arrowroot Biscuits   350 g   Best Before
2017 MR 01
  0 66721 01046 9
Mr. Christie’s   Arrowroot Biscuits   3.6 kg –
  300 x 12 g
(2-pack)
  Best Before
2017 MA 13
  1 00 66721 51404 9

 

The Oct. 21 recall covered:

  • 350 g with UPC number 0 66721 01046 9 with one of the following date codes: Best Before 2017 FE 24; or Best Before 2017 FE 28;
  • 1.4 kg with UPC number 0 66721 01856 4 and one of the following date codes: Best Before 2017 FE 20; Best Before 2017 FE 21; Best Before 2017 FE 22; or Best Before 2017 FE 23;
  • 3.5 kg (Bulk) with UPC number 1 00 66721 51038 6 and the date code: Best Before 2017 AL 25; and 
  • 3.6 kg 300 x 12 g (2-pack) with UPC number 1 00 66721 51404 9 and one of the following date codes: Best Before 2017 AL 21; Best Before 2017 AL 22; Best Before 2017 AL 23; Best Before 2017 AL 24; Best Before 2017 AL 25; Best Before 2017 AL 29; Best Before 2017 AL 30; Best Before 2017 MA 01; Best Before 2017 MA 02; Best Before 2017 MA 05; or Best Before 2017 MA 12.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2epQPVM

Friday, October 28, 2016

One child dead; Salmonella outbreak ‘may not have peaked yet’

A Salmonella outbreak in Europe that may have been ongoing since 2012 is believed to be responsible for the recent death of a child in Croatia and is suspected to be wider spread than originally thought.

The outbreak has been traced by multiple countries to eggs from Poland.

Recalls are ongoing across Europe and in Hong Kong, as seven countries are reporting a total of 260 illnesses between May 1 and Oct. 12 this year. Of those cases, 112 are confirmed and 148 are listed as probable.

To read the report, click on the image.

A joint technical report issued Thursday by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) came out as the Centre for Food Safety in Hong Kong was warning consumers and foodservice operators to look for the eggs and discard them.

“The first isolates belonging to one of the (whole genome sequence) WGS clusters associated with this outbreak were identified in 2012. The number of confirmed and probable cases has increased steadily since May 2016,” according to the joint report.

“Taking into account the reporting delay, the outbreak may not have peaked yet. New cases are expected to be reported, particularly in Belgium and the Netherlands where the majority of the cases were identified in the recent weeks.”

Shell eggs and unpasteurized liquid eggs are implicated. At least 10 farms and one packing center in Poland have been linked to the outbreak by traceback investigations. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) has shown two clusters of illnesses, both traced to the Polish eggs.

“Outbreak cases, both confirmed and probable, have been reported by Belgium, Denmark, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom,” according to the joint report issued Thursday.

“Nine of the confirmed cases are associated with a travel history to Hungary or Poland, both of which countries are also considered to be affected by this outbreak. In addition, Croatia reported a cluster of S. Enteritidis cases, including a fatal case, with an epidemiological link to the outbreak.”

The fatality in Croatia was a five-year-old child, who was one of five family members who were infected with Salmonella Enteritidis after eating eggs from Poland.

Outbreak strains on the radar since 2012

To read the report, click on the image.

To read the report, click on the image.

Officials across the EU have been tracking two clusters of Salmonella infections since at least February 2012, according to the ECDC and EFSA. Ebbs and surges in confirmed cases have led health and agriculture officials to think the outbreak was over more than once.

“The sampling time between the different food isolates belonging to the WGS clusters associated with this outbreak detected in the Netherlands and Norway demonstrates that products contaminated with the outbreak strain from the packing center in Poland have been distributed to different EU countries on multiple occasions in a period of at least seventeen months between May 2015 and October 2016,” according to the ECDC and EFSA joint report.

“To date, only cases from countries performing typing of S. Enteritidis isolates have been identified. Since typing is performed in a minority of countries it is likely that more countries and substantially more cases are part of this outbreak. Based on information from the WGS investigation, it is also possible that this multi-country outbreak is associated with one or more common sources persisting in the EU/EEA since at least 2012.”

Action taken in Poland
In Poland, the Local Veterinary Inspector took swabs from surfaces in the production area of the implicated packing center. The Local Veterinary Inspector also took stool samples at the 10 farms and samples of eggs originating from the farms that provide eggs to the mentioned Polish packing center.

Analyses of the samples collected at the packing center and farms was ongoing and not available for the ECDC/EFSA joint report filed Thursday.

In a separate statement, the Chief Veterinary Officer of Poland reported the administrative decision ordering the egg recall this week came after Salmonella enteritidis was found in two flocks of laying hens.

The recalled eggs have sell-by dates through November and one of the two following numbers stamped on their shells: 3PL30221321 or 3PL30221304.

Neither Polish nor European Commission authorities named the packing facility or farms implicated in the outbreak.

Warning, recall in Honk Kong
In the warning from the Centre for Food Safety (CFS) of the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department in Hong Kong, two importers were named.

“Our investigation revealed that two Hong Kong importers, Yee Tai Trading Company and Winbo Trading International Company Limited, had imported in different batches a total of 4,730 cartons and 961 cartons of the affected eggs from Poland respectively,” according to the CFS warning.

The warning did not indicate if any probable or confirmed outbreak cases had been reported in Hong Kong.

Polish officials did not include Hong Kong in the distribution details reported to the European Commission.

Earlier this week Poland provided the following list of countries to which eggs were distributed, directly or indirectly: Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Romania and the United Kingdom.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2f1w6XW

Back to Nature recalls granola, cookies for undeclared milk

Back to Nature Foods LLC of Naples, FL, is voluntarily recalling the products below because they contain chocolate purchased from a third-party supplier which was found to contain milk not listed as an ingredient on the label.

Persons who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to milk run the risk of a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume these products.

The affected cookie and granola products were distributed to retail stores nationwide. No other products or best-by dates are affected. The recalled products are:

Back to Nature Products UPC Best By Date
Chocolate Delight Granola
11oz
19898-01201 12/25/16 – 7/27/17
Dark Chocolate Coconut Granola
11oz
19898-01225 5/9/17 – 8/14/17
Chocolate Chunk Cookies
9.5oz
19898-01100 5/8/17 – 5/12/17
Mini Chocolate Chunk Cookies
6 x 1.25oz
19898-01114 (Tray)
19898-01115 (Pouch)
5/1/17
Mini Chocolate Chunk Cookies
100 x 1.25oz
19898-01148 (Case)
19898-01115 (Pouch)
5/1/17
Mini Chocolate Chunk Cookies
9 x 2.5oz
19898-01144 (Caddy)
19898-01143 (Pouch)
5/1/17

Back to Nature granolaBest-by date codes can be found on the top of the bottom of the Granola packaging, the top of the Chocolate Chunk 9.5-ounce carton, and on the back of the Mini Chocolate Chunk Tray or individual package.

Consumers who have purchased the Back to Nature Chocolate Chunk Cookies, Mini Chocolate Chunk Cookies, Chocolate Delight Granola, or Dark Chocolate Granola with the UPC numbers and dates noted, and have an allergy to milk, should destroy the product they have or return it to the place of purchase for replacement or refund.

Consumers with questions may call Back to Nature’s Consumer Relations Center at 844-275-5845. The center is open Monday through Friday from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. (ET). Consumers also may contact the center via email by visiting the Contact Us page on the company’s website for a replacement coupon.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2eXWR0A

Thursday, October 27, 2016

Stewart’s Sportade Fruit Punch recalled for undeclared milk

Stewart’s Shops Corp. of Saratoga Springs, NY, is recalling certain units of Stewart’s Sportade Fruit Punch Isotonic Beverage because they may contain undeclared milk. People who have an allergy to milk run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume this product.

Approximately 1,600 units of affected product were distributed in upstate New York and Southern Vermont, and nearly half of the units had already been recovered as of Wednesday afternoon, according to the company.

Stewart's Sportade Fruit PunchThe Sportade Fruit Punch is packaged in a 20-ounce plastic bottle, UPC 0 82086 31006 8, and has a black label with a red plastic cap.

Affected units have an expiration code date of DEC 02, which can be found on the neck of the bottle. All other expiration code dates of Sportade Fruit Punch are not affected by this recall.

No illnesses have been reported to date in connection with this problem, the company stated.

The recall was initiated after routine quality control testing discovered that a milk allergen was in the product.

Customers who purchased Stewart’s Sportade Fruit Punch with a code date of DEC 02 are urged to return the product to their local Stewart’s Shops for a full refund.

Customers with questions may contact Stewart’s Consumer Affairs Department at 518-581-1200, ext. 2130, Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2dPvZxR

Wednesday, October 26, 2016

No new Hepatitis A cases in Hawaii outbreak during past week

For the first time since July 6, Hawaii’s weekly Hepatitis A outbreak update did not include any new cases this week. The victim count held steady at 291.

raw scallopsWhen the Hawaii Department of Health first informed the public of the outbreak, the cause was a mystery. People started getting sick with the virus on June 12. More than two months later officials identified frozen scallops from the Philippines and served raw at Genki Sushi restaurants as the source.

State health officials impounded the implicated scallops and closed down the restaurants for cleaning and sanitizing, but people kept getting sick. That was expected — and continues to be expected — because it can take up to 50 days for a person to develop symptoms after exposure. The most recent person to be confirmed as part of the outbreak became ill on Oct. 9.

Although it’s been more than 50 days since restaurants stopped serving the implicated scallops, additional cases can occur because infected people can spread the disease to their family and other people they are in close contact with, according to Hawaii Epidemiologist Sarah Park.

Also, there continues to be a risk that a handful of employees at other restaurants who have been confirmed with the outbreak strain may have exposed customers.

A list of the restaurants where at least one employee has been identified with the outbreak strain of Hepatitis A is posted on the health department’s website, along with the dates they worked when they were contagious.

“This list does not indicate these businesses are sources of this outbreak; at this time, no infections have been linked to exposure to these businesses,” according to the weekly update posted Wednesday.

“The likelihood that patrons of these businesses will become infected is very low. However, persons who have consumed food or drink products from these businesses during the identified dates of service should contact their healthcare provider for advice and possible preventive care.”

Following are the restaurants remaining on the list as of Wednesday:

Business Island    Location   Dates of Service
Harbor Restaurant at Pier 38 Oahu    Honolulu (1133 North Nimitz Highway)   Aug. 26 through Sept. 12
Ohana Seafood at Sam’s Club Oahu    Pearl City (1000 Kamehameha Highway)   Aug. 29 through Sept. 11
Chart House Restaurant Oahu    Waikiki (1765 Ala Moana Boulevard)   Sept. 1–4 and 8–11
McDonald’s Oahu    Kahala (4618 Kilauea Avenue)   Sept. 20–21, 23–24, 27–29, and Oct. 1, 4–5, 7, and 11

For additional details on the outbreak and investigation, please see our previous coverage:

FDA confirms Hepatitis A in scallops; multi-state recall begins
228 Hepatitis A cases in Hawaii; lawsuit could include 10,000
A fourth of Hawaii’s Hepatitis A victims admitted to hospitals

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2exIrWT

Meat and poultry recalled for misbranding, allergen, and no inspections

gaiser'schickenbologna_406x250Union, NJ-based Gaiser’s European Style Provision Inc. has recalled approximately 3,895 pounds of chicken and pork bologna products due to misbranding, undeclared allergens, and being formulated with meat and poultry products that were not federally inspected, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

The products may contain nonfat dry milk, a known allergen which is not declared on the finished product label. The bologna items were produced on various dates from Oct. 6, 2016 to Oct. 20, 2016.

The following products are subject to recall:

  • 1-lb. chubb artificial casing containing “Gaiser’s RUSSIAN BRAND PROFESSORSKAYA BOLOGNA” pork bologna with various packaging dates from Oct. 10, 2016 to Oct. 21, 2016.
  • 10-lb. chubb artificial casing containing “Gaiser’s PROFESSORSKAYA” pork bologna with various packaging dates from Oct. 10, 2016 to Oct. 21, 2016.
  • 1-lb. chubb artificial casing containing “NetCost Market PROFESSORSKAYA BRAND BOLOGNA” with various packaging dates from Oct. 10, 2016 to Oct. 21, 2016.
  • 1-lb. chubb artificial casing containing “Gaiser’s CHICKEN BOLOGNA” with various packaging dates from Oct. 10, 2016 to Oct. 21, 2016.
  • 3-lb. chubb artificial casing containing “Gaiser’s CHICKEN BOLOGNA” with various packaging dates from Oct. 10, 2016 to Oct. 21, 2016.
  • 1-lb. chubb artificial casing containing “NetCost Market CHICKEN BOLOGNA” with various packaging dates from Oct. 10, 2016 to Oct. 21, 2016.

The products subject to recall bear establishment number “EST. 5385 or P-5385” inside the USDA mark of inspection. These items were shipped to retail locations and/or for institutional use in California, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York and Washington.

The mistakes were discovered during a Food Safety Assessment conducted by FSIS personnel.

No confirmed reports of illness or adverse reactions due to consumption of these products have yet been turned in.   Anyone concerned about an injury or illness should contact a healthcare provider.

Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2dYv7dx

Tuesday, October 25, 2016

EU members say Salmonella outbreak linked to Polish eggs

It’s unclear how many members of the European Union received eggs from Poland that have been implicated in an ongoing Salmonella outbreak that began in July 2015 and has sickened almost 150 people.

Belgium, France and Germany received some of the eggs, according to information filed with the European Commission’s Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF). As many as 10 countries may have received the eggs, according to reports from Radio Poland.

eggsinbulk_406x250Croatia and the Netherlands filed official notifications last week with RASFF. Chicken eggs from Poland were sampled Oct. 12 for Salmonella enteritidis and the eggs have been withdrawn from the market in Croatia, according to its notification.

After testing a large number of eggs, Croatian health authorities have not isolated salmonella in any samples taken, according to the country’s agriculture officials who issued a statement Thursday.

“Following the official information provided by the Health Ministry about a case of food poisoning caused by Salmonella believed to have come from eggs and a notification received through the EU RASFF food and safety alerts system about a possible salmonella outbreak in several member states, Minister Tomislav Tolusic, acting in agreement with the Health Minister, is notifying the public that eggs originating from Poland are being recalled from the market,” the Croatian Agriculture Ministry said in a news release.

The European Commission set up a meeting Friday with representatives from several EU countries to discuss the situation. The Polish Agricultural Ministry reported the eggs had been sent to Belgium, the Netherlands and Croatia, according to Radio Poland.

Although distribution details remain unclear, Belgium officials reported the eggs did not go to retailers.

However, the Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain in Belgium “several shipments of Polish eggs contaminated with Salmonella” were distributed to seven EU countries, including hundreds of restaurants in Belgium, from “various Dutch suppliers.”

Resurgence of outbreak
Health, agriculture and food safety officials in six EU countries have been watching the Salmonella outbreak since July 2015. The European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) thought the outbreak was over early this year, but a surge of new cases that began in April refocused attention, with the case count estimated at 150 in recent weeks.

Amidst the ongoing outbreak, the ECDC reported in August that infections from Salmonella bacteria declined from 2006 through 2010.

“There was an 8.8 percent reduction in the number of confirmed cases between 2009 (with) 108,618 confirmed cases and 2010 (with) 99,020 confirmed cases. This decline has been attributed to the successful implementation of Salmonella control programs in poultry populations,” according to the August report.

That good news was tempered this week with the publication of research in the European journal on infectious diseases, Eurosurveillance, that while control measures have been somewhat successful they have not address all laying hens whose eggs are produced for sale.

“Despite the overall decrease in outbreaks of Salmonella infection in the EU, surveillance data since 1991 in Poland have shown that egg products play a pivotal role in the occurrence of salmonellosis outbreaks in humans, with 63 percent of the outbreaks between 2005 and 2010 being linked to this source,” according to the research abstract.

“The most striking increase has been in the proportion of outbreaks due to S. Enteritidis infection linked with the consumption of home-produced eggs: surveillance data show an increase from 76 percent of all S. Enteritidis outbreaks in 2004 to 82 percent in 2010.”

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2etBV3r

Tainted tahina recalled by Michigan’s Sinbad Foods

tahini-406x250West Bloomfield Township, located 30 miles northwest of Detroit, is the latest location for a tahini product recall.

Sinbad Foods, located at 6251 Haggerty Road, said in a Tuesday news release that 1-pound and 2-pound containers of its Tahina Telkef with “packed on” dates of Oct. 7, 2016, and “sell by” dates of Dec. 5, 2016, are on the recall list.

The one-pound containers have the numbers 0200004506472 or 0200004406413 in the barcode. Two-pound containers will have 0200000406295 in the barcode.

The potential Salmonella contamination was discovered with the Michigan Department of Agricultural and Rural Development when it conducted tests on a sample of the product. No illness reports have been turned in yet.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2eQM2xu

Foreign materials in wild planet cans requires recall

Crider Inc. in Stillmore, GA Tuesday recalled approximately 5,610 pounds of canned Organic Roasted Chicken Breast that may be contaminated with foreign materials according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

The cans of Wild Planet Organic Roasted Chicken Breast were produced on January 16, 2016.  Subject to recall:

  • Chicken_Can.JPG1,496 cases of 5 ounce cans of “Wild Planet Organic Roasted Chicken Breast – 100% Chicken Breast & Sea Salt – No Liquids Added” with a Best Buy Date of 01/16/18

The products subject to recall bear establishment number “EST. 31812” inside the USDA mark of inspection. These items were shipped to multiple distributers for further distribution.

The problem was discovered when a distributer received two complaints from consumers involving foreign matter in the product on October 2, 2016 and October 9, 2016.

The company received a report of a potential injury associated with consumption of this product. FSIS has received no additional reports of injury or illness from consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about an injury or illness should contact a healthcare provider.

Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

FSIS routinely conducts recall effectiveness checks to verify recalling firms notify their customers of the recall and that steps are taken to make certain that the product is no longer available to consumers. When available, the retail distribution list(s) will be posted on the FSIS website.



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2ePORit

Monday, October 24, 2016

Chicken and dumplings recalled for misbranding, undeclared allergen

St. Clair Foods Inc. of Memphis, TN, is recalling approximately 26,800 pounds of chicken and dumplings due to misbranding and an undeclared allergen, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced Oct. 21.

St.-Clair-chicken-and-dumplingsThe chicken and dumplings were produced on various dates from Sept. 13 through Oct. 6. The products contain milk, a known allergen, which was not declared on the product label.

The following products are subject to recall:

  • 5-lb. plastic sealed packages containing “ST. CLAIR FOODS CHICKEN AND DUMPLINGS” bearing package codes 16257, 16264, and 16280
  • 2-lb. plastic sealed packages containing “ST. CLAIR FOODS CHICKEN AND DUMPLINGS” bearing package codes 16257, 16264, and 16280
  • 5-lb. plastic sealed packages containing “RON’S HOMESTYLE FOODS CHICKEN AND DUMPLINGS” bearing package codes 16280, 16272, 16264, and 16257

The products subject to recall bear establishment number “EST-6568” inside the USDA mark of inspection. These items were shipped to foodservice warehouses and distributed for institutional use in Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Tennessee and Texas.

The problem was discovered Oct. 20 during a review of product specifications. The company stated that it was not notified by the ingredient supplier that there was a change in the dumpling ingredients to include the addition of milk and immediately notified FSIS that the undeclared milk allergen ingredient was incorporated into their products.

There have been no confirmed reports of injury, illness, or adverse reactions due to consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about an injury or illness should contact a healthcare provider.

Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them but to throw them away or return them to the place of purchase.

Consumers with questions about the recall can contact Monica Woodruff at 901-322-7301.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2eo5XWq

Michigan firm recalls fruit butters, preserves for undeclared milk

Brownwood Farms of Williamsburg, MI, is recalling about 260,000 units of fruit butters and fruit preserves because they contain undeclared milk. People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to milk run the risk of a serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume these products.

Brownwood Farms Pear & Cinnamon Preserves labelThe affected products were distributed across the United States through distributors, retailers and online sales from the Brownwood Farms website.

All products listed below with the referenced “best by” dates are included in this recall. “Best by” dates are indicated on labels affixed to the bottom of all affected products. The affected products are all packaged in glass containers with metal lids.

Brownwood Farms has recalled the following products for undeclared milk:

  • AMERICA’S ORIGINAL CHERRY BUTTER 12 oz. – UPC 018303-005011- with best by dates before 09/28/2018
  • AMERICA’S ORIGINAL CHERRY BUTTER 22 oz. – UPC 018303-005301- with best by dates before 09/28/2018
  • AMERICA’S ORIGINAL CHERRY BUTTER – 1 gallon – with best by dates before 09/28/2018
  • CHERRY RASPBERRY PRESERVES 12 oz. – UPC 018303-005035 – with best by dates before 09/28/2018
  • CHERRY RASPBERRY PRESERVES – 1 gallon – with best by dates before 09/28/2018
  • MICHIGAN CHERRY PRESERVES 12 oz. – UPC 018303-005028 – with best by dates before 09/28/2018
  • MICHIGAN CHERRY PRESERVES – 1 gallon – with best by dates before 09/28/2018
  • PEAR AND CINNAMON PRESERVES 10 oz. – UPC 018303-005172 – with best by dates before 09/28/2018
  • PEAR AND CINNAMON PRESERVES – 1 gallon – with best by dates before 09/28/2018
  • STRAWBERRY PRESERVES 12 oz. – UPC 018303-005059 – with best by dates before 09/28/2018
  • STRAWBERRY PRESERVES – 1 gallon – with best by dates before 09/28/2018
  • JALAPENO CHERRY BUTTER – 12 oz. – UPC 018303 – 005134 – with best by dates before 09/28/2018
  • JALAPENO CHERRY BUTTER – 20 oz. – UPC 018303 – 005325 – with best by dates before 09/28/2018
  • JALAPENO CHERRY BUTTER – 1 gallon – with best by dates before 09/28/2018

No illnesses had been reported as of Thursday, according to the company.

The recall was initiated after an employee discovered that ingredients used in the production of the affected products contained milk in the form of butter, and the packaged product did not have labels indicating the presence of milk.

Any consumers having the recalled product are urged to return it to their retailer for a full refund. Consumers with questions may contact the company Monday through Friday at 888-772-9444 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. EDT or via email at recall@brownwoodfarms.com.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2eLmfql

Saturday, October 22, 2016

Beach Beat: It’s not people, it’s algal flour and soy protein

When the recall alert for Soylent brand “Food Bars” hit my email a couple of days ago I would have thought it was a colleague pulling my leg but for the standard coding and language from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.

beach-beatThe thought of the name Soylent applied to an “engineered food” designed to “expand access to quality nutrition through food system innovation” and “produced efficiently in bioreactors, rather than on farmland” gave me a giggle. It reminded me of what I consider to be Charlton Heston and Edward G. Robinson’s best movie.

Thanks, by the way to our readers who piped up in the comment thread on the story with their tongues in their cheeks. After I had my giggle at the product’s name — and then a guffaw when I checked out the company’s descriptions of its products — I realized my amusement was probably a reflection of my advancing age.

I had heard of the meal replacement powders and beverages sold under the Soylent brand before Friday, but the mental image of a Soylent “Food Bar” was a whole different picture.

The 1973 motion picture “Soylent Green,” which featured Robinson in a death scene to die for, has an intriguing sub-plot question that was teased to perfection by the film’s title. Everyone in the over-populated, futuristic flic wanted to know what made Soylent Green so much more flavorful than Soylent Red or Soylent Yellow. Spoiler Alert: Soylent Green is people.

For some reason that four-word revelation is among a handful of movie lines that have transcended most of the newsrooms I’ve frequented. At any moment in time, five minutes or five hours from deadline, someone will just announce to the newsroom at large: “Soylent Green is people.”

I’ve no idea why so many print journalists I’ve worked with enjoy that line. Similarly, I couldn’t imagine why anyone would name any food product “Soylent” unless it was designed to be served by vendors at Star Trek conventions.

Soylent Food Bar ingredientsThen I visited the Soylent website that describes the products, mission and vision of four young men who co-founded Rosa Foods Inc., which produces the Soylent line. They explain their mission: “Expand access to quality nutrition through food system innovation” and suggest “While not intended to replace every meal, Soylent can replace any meal.”

They haven’t been able to explain why dozens of consumers have been posting comments — since the Soylent Food Bars started shipping the first week of September — detailing how they’ve been plagued by gastro reactions including vomiting and diarrhea.

Many of those customers profess their loyalty to Soylent powders and beverages after they describe classic food poisoning symptoms that developed after they tried the much anticipated Soylent Food Bars.

Kudos to Rosa Foods Inc. of Los Angeles for stopping distribution and eventually recalling the Soylent Food Bars until they figure out what’s up. And kudos to them for crediting their brand name to Harry Harrison’s 1966 science fiction novel “Make Room! Make Room!” that served as the loose basis for “Soylent Green.”

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2eFLXLT

Salmon roe recalled nationwide in Canada; botulism possible

Imperial Caviar & Seafood has expanded its recall of salmon roe for the second time, urging consumers to not eat the salmon eggs because of concerns about botulism poisoning.

recalled Imperial Caviar and Seafood salmon roeThe Fairfield, NJ-based company recalled some salmon roe Sept. 15 that had been distributed to retailers in Quebec. The next day the company expanded the recall to include certain lots of its Imperial Caviar & Seafood branded salmon roe that had been distributed nationwide in Canada.

Now the company has added another batch of 50-gram containers of the salmon eggs, distributed in Quebec, to the recall. No illnesses had been confirmed in relation to the recalled salmon roe as of Friday, according to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA).

“Check to see if you have recalled products in your home. Recalled products should be thrown out or returned to the store where they were purchased,” according to the recall notice on the CFIA website.

“Food contaminated with Clostridium botulinum toxin may not look or smell spoiled but can still make you sick. Symptoms can include nausea, vomiting, fatigue, dizziness, blurred or double vision, dry mouth, respiratory failure and paralysis. In severe cases of illness, people may die.”

In foodborne botulism, symptoms generally begin 18 to 36 hours after eating a contaminated food, but they can occur as soon as six hours or as long as 10 days after exposure.

recalled Imperial Caviar and Seafood salmon roe labelAnyone who has eaten any of the recalled salmon eggs and developed symptoms of botulism poisoning should immediately seek medical attention and inform their doctors about the possible exposure.

Consumers can identify the recalled Imperial Caviar & Seafood brand salmon roe in the following sized containers with the specified label codes:

  • 50 grams
    BB/MA: 23-AUG-2017
    LOT: 23616-03
    1 86866 00010 8
  • 50 grams
    BB/MA 23-AUG-2017
    LOT: 23616-03
    1 86866 90024 8
  • 50 grams
    BB/MA 23-AUG-2017
    LOT: 23616-04
    1 86866 90024 8
  • 100 grams
    12-FEB-17
    04116-02

 

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2dL9FZz

Friday, October 21, 2016

Illnesses spur nationwide Mr. Christie’s recall in Canada

Mr. Christie’s brand Arrowroot Biscuits are under recall nationwide in Canada after consumers have reported illnesses after eating the cookies, which some describe as having an off taste.

Mondelēz Canada of the multinational snack company Mondelēz International  Inc. reported the cookies were distributed to retailers across Canada in the Oct. 21 recall notice on the Canadian Food Inspection Agency’s website.

To see additional photos of the packaging for the recalled Mr. Christie's biscuits, click on the image.

To see additional photos of the packaging for the recalled Mr. Christie’s biscuits, click on the image.

“Check to see if you have recalled products in your home. Recalled products should be thrown out or returned to the store where they were purchased,” according to the recall notice.

“There have been reported illnesses associated with the consumption of these products. If you think you became sick from consuming a recalled product, call your doctor.”

Officials advise consumers to check their homes for the recalled products. If they have them, they should be discarded or returned to the place of purchase.

Mondelēz Canada reported the products were sold nationally in Canada only. The recalled Mr. Christie’s brand Arrowroot Biscuits can be identified by information on the packaging:

  • 350 g with UPC number 0 66721 01046 9 with one of the following date codes: Best Before 2017 FE 24; or Best Before 2017 FE 28;
  • 1.4 kg with UPC number 0 66721 01856 4 and one of the following date codes: Best Before 2017 FE 20; Best Before 2017 FE 21; Best Before 2017 FE 22; or Best Before 2017 FE 23;
  • 3.5 kg (Bulk) with UPC number 1 00 66721 51038 6 and the date code: Best Before 2017 AL 25; and
  • 3.6 kg 300 x 12 g (2-pack) with UPC number 1 00 66721 51404 9 and one of the following date codes: Best Before 2017 AL 21; Best Before 2017 AL 22; Best Before 2017 AL 23; Best Before 2017 AL 24; Best Before 2017 AL 25; Best Before 2017 AL 29; Best Before 2017 AL 30; Best Before 2017 MA 01; Best Before 2017 MA 02; Best Before 2017 MA 05; or Best Before 2017 MA 12.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2dx1rAC

Soylent Food Bars recalled after dozens of unconfirmed illnesses

With dozens of consumers complaining online about classic food poisoning symptoms after eating Soylent Food Bars, Canadian officials announced a recall of the meal replacement product late today.

Rosa Foods Inc. of Los Angeles just started marketing the Soylent brand nutrition supplement bars in August, with the first shipments going to consumers via Internet sales beginning in September.

Arecalled Soylent Food Bar-individuallmost immediately consumers began posting reports of intense vomiting and diarrhea, according to the tech news website Gizmodo. Soylent officials said the bars — primarily made of soy protein and algae flour according to the company’s website — are manufactured at an FDA-inspected facility and a subjected to microbiological testing before shipping, according to the Los Angeles Times.

recallent Soylent Food Bar-boxThe recall posted this evening by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) reports there have been illnesses associated with the Soylent Food Bar products, but does not specify symptoms or numbers of sick people.

“Check to see if you have recalled product in your home. Recalled products should be thrown out. This recall was triggered by the company. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency is conducting a food safety investigation, which may lead to the recall of other products,” according to the recall notice on the CFIA website.

Health Canada also posted a warning urging consumers to check for the recalled meal replacement bars and through them away.

Company officials had already pulled the new Soylent Food Bars from the stream of commerce, announcing on the brand’s website on Oct. 12 they were “halting all Soylent Bar purchases and shipments and are advising our customers to discard any remaining bars in their possession.”

“After hearing from our customers, we immediately began investigating the cause of the issue and whether it was linked to a problem with the bars,” according to the Soylent blog and Facebook posts. “So far we have not yet identified one and this issue does not appear to affect our other drinks and powder. …

“We will be reaching out via e-mail to all Bar customers to offer a full refund. … Until we are absolutely certain our products are safe, they will not be shipped.”

Any customers with questions are urged to contact the Delaware company, which has offices in Los Angeles, via email at: info@soylent.com. Consumers can identify the recalled Soylent Food Bars by the following packaging information:

Soylent Food Bar, 60 grams, sold individually without UPC numbers, with any of the following date codes:

  • 14JUL17
  • 15JUL17
  • 18JUL17
  • 02AUG17
  • 04AUG17
  • 08AUG17
  • 10AUG17

Silent Food Bar, 60 grams, sold in 12-count boxes with the UPC number 858369006023 and any of the following date codes:

  • 14JUL17
  • 15JUL17
  • 18JUL17
  • 02AUG17
  • 04AUG17
  • 08AUG17
  • 10AUG17

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration had not posted any recall information about the Soylent Food Bars as of 11 p.m. EDT Friday.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2e99mag

Over 63 tons of pulled pork recalled for not listing soy on label

pulledpork_406x250Brookwood Farms, Inc. in  Siler City, NC  recalled approximately 126,570 pounds of pulled pork products Thursday  due to misbranding and undeclared allergens, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). The product contains soy, a known allergen which is not declared on the product label. The fully cooked, pulled pork items were produced between June 12, 2014 and Oct. 21, 2016.  Recalled are:

  • 5-lb. plastic bags containing “COOKED PULLED PORK CARNITA STYLE.”

The products subject to recall bear establishment number “EST. 1740” inside the USDA mark of inspection and code 15006 on the label. These items were distributed nationwide for institutional use.

The label error  was discovered by FSIS inspection personnel while conducting routine label verification activities. There has not yet  been any reports of injury, illness, or adverse reactions due to consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about an injury or illness should contact a healthcare provider.

Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

FSIS routinely conducts recall effectiveness checks to verify recalling firms notify their customers of the recall and that steps are taken to make certain that the product is no longer available to consumers.



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2epmolJ

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Listeria patient dies; Foody World store remains closed

A grocery store specializing in Asian food remains closed as Canadian officials continue to investigate a Listeria outbreak that has hospitalized at least six people, one of whom has died.

Public health officials from Vancouver Coastal Health told CBC News on Monday that they had not yet determined if Listeria monocytogenes infection caused the death because the victim had other underlying serious health issues.

foodyworld_406x250The specific source of the Listeria contamination at Foody World in Richmond, British Columbia, remains unknown, but Vancouver Coastal Health is warning customers not to consume any produce or ready-to-eat foods made in-house at the grocery store at 3000 Sexsmith Road in Richmond.

“Potentially contaminated items include all ready-to-eat meat products such as BBQ pork and marinated meats, sushi, produce and baked goods purchased since July 2016. If you have any produce, ready-to-eat or raw food items from Foody World, please dispose of them immediately,” according to the warning, which public health officials posted Friday.

“The store will be reopened once it meets all health and safety standards.”

Anyone who has eaten any of the suspect foods and developed symptoms of listeriosis should seek medical attention and inform their doctors about the possible exposure to Listeria monocytogenes.

It can take up to 70 days for symptoms to develop, but most people become ill within four weeks of consuming contaminated food or beverages.

Symptoms of listeriosis include fever, headache, diarrhea, vomiting and muscle aches. Listeriosis can also cause serious illness such as meningitis or blood infections in pregnant women and newborns, those with weakened immune systems and older adults or seniors, according to the public warning.

For more information about the food recall, the public can call Vancouver Coastal Health – Health Protection at 604-233-3147 and ask to speak to a senior environmental health officer. Additional information is available at the following websites:

For additional details, please see: “BC’s Foody World shut down for Listeria contamination

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2ePCLc1

Norovirus outbreak closes shellfish beds in Cape Cod town

After receiving reports last week of about 75 norovirus cases, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and the Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries closed down shellfish beds in the Town of Wellfleet on Cape Cod.

State food protection officials also notified businesses to recall any affected shellfish harvested in the area on or after Sept. 26, according to a public health advisory issued Oct. 13.

MA oyster beds closure map

The areas temporarily closed to shellfish harvesting are CCB11, CCB12, CCB13 and CCB14.

“Public health officials have received reports of approximately 75 suspect cases of norovirus over the past two days, primarily associated with eating raw shellfish at weddings and restaurants in the Outer Cape Cod area,” the advisory noted.

Harvesting of oysters and other shellfish in Wellfleet will be closed for at least three weeks, although other Cape Cod shellfish-harvesting areas are not affected. The currently closed areas include Wellfleet Harbor, Wellfleet Inner Harbor, Herring River and Loagy Bay.

“The National Shellfish Sanitation Program requires a minimum closure of 21 days,” said Katie Gronendyke, a spokeswoman for the Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries in Boston. “The state has to demonstrate that there are no ongoing pollution problems by conducting a resurvey of the area and an evaluation of all real and potential pollution sources.”

It’s not clear how many businesses might be involved in the recall because locally harvested shellfish — oysters as well as mussels and clams — are shipped all over the world, said Hillary Greenberg-Lemos, a health and conservation agent for the Town of Wellfleet.

The lack of raw oysters affected the 16th annual Wellfleet OysterFest held this past weekend. No raw shellfish were served at the event, and the popular “Shuck Off” contest used oysters sourced from outside the area.

“Public safety has always been our top priority, whether it be in crowd management or health issues,” said Alex Hay, a board member of the group that puts on the OysterFest, adding, “Not only is public safety our main concern, it is also in the seafood industry’s best interest, the town’s best interest and the Wellfleet brand’s best interest.”

Norovirus is easily spread through food, person-to-person contact, or through contact with contaminated surfaces such as countertops or door knobs. The viruses can cause vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal cramps. Other symptoms may include headache, fever, chills and muscle aches.

For most people, noroviruses cause a very unpleasant but brief illness that usually lasts one or two days. The elderly, very young and people with weakened immune systems are at higher risk of more serious illness from noroviruses. The greatest danger is from dehydration.

http://ift.tt/2aPKjuFThe Massachusetts Department of Public Health offered this safety advice to the public:

  • Do not eat any shellfish from the affected areas if harvested or purchased on or after Sept. 26. This includes oysters, hard-shell clams (“quahogs”), soft-shell clams (“steamers”), mussels and razor clams.
  • If you are unsure where shellfish was harvested, contact the retailer or restaurant where the product was purchased.
  • If you are experiencing symptoms of norovirus, or are caring for someone who is, practice good hand washing with warm, soapy water to prevent further spread of the illness.
  • After episodes of vomiting or diarrhea, clean contaminated surfaces immediately with a bleach-based household cleaner and wash hands thoroughly afterward. The virus is present in large numbers in both stool and vomit.
  • Contact your healthcare provider if you have more severe illness or if you think you may be dehydrated.

For more information about noroviruses, Bay State residents can contact the Massachusetts Department of Public Health’s Division of Epidemiology at 617-983-6800. For more information on the shellfish-harvesting closure notice, call 508-990-2860.

According to a study published in August 2015 in the journal Applied and Environmental Microbiology, oysters act as incubators for noroviruses to mutate between outbreaks, and raw oysters appear to be particularly dangerous in this way.

“Shellfish such as oysters, clams, and mussels are filter feeders and ingest norovirus if it is present in the water. Through filter feeding, oysters may concentrate the virus to much higher levels than might be found in the surrounding water,” the Washington State Department of Health has reported.

“Potential sources of contamination include faulty wastewater treatment plants, failing septic systems, stormwater runoff, dumping of boat sewage waste, and vomiting overboard near shellfish beds.”

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2ejUm8X

Saturday, October 15, 2016

27 tons of turkey recalled over unidentified black material

Michigan Turkey Producers of Grand Rapids Saturday recalled  approximately 54,011 pounds of turkey breast products that may be contaminated with extraneous materials, specifically an unidentified black material, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

It was the third and largest recall of the weekend for USDA-regulated products.

The oven roasted turkey breast items (logs and sliced) were produced on August 29, 2016 and September 16, 2016. On the recall list are:

  • SITK_RoastTurkeyBreast_WeekendCooking_000022784185_447x28612-lb. packages containing “MESON SANDWICHES, OVEN ROASTED SLICED TURKEY BREAST” with a use or freeze by date of 11/27/16, and a case code of “48598” on the left side of the label
  • 22-lb. logs containing “OVEN ROASTED TURKEY BREAST WITH BROTH,” with a use or freeze by date of 11/27/16, and a case code of “48576” on the left side of the label
  • 22-lb. logs containing “OVEN ROASTED TURKEY BREAST WITH BROTH,” with a use or freeze by date of 12/15/16, and a case code of “48576” on the left side of the label

The recalled products bear establishment number “P-20935A” inside the USDA mark of inspection. These items were shipped to a distribution center in Florida and food services in Florida and Puerto Rico.

A customer’s complaint called out the problem.

FSIS has yet to receive any  confirmed reports of injury or illness from consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about an injury or illness should contact a healthcare provider. The agency says consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

FSIS routinely conducts recall effectiveness checks to verify recalling firms notify their customers of the recall and that steps are taken to make certain that the product is no longer available to consumers. When available, the retail distribution list(s) will be posted on the FSIS website.



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2eaFqcF

E. coli O26 detected in recalled Louisiana meat products

meatcounter_406x250Reserve-LA-based National Meat and Provisions late Friday recalled approximately 2,349 pounds of beef and veal products that may be contaminated with E. coli O26, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

The raw non-intact beef and veal items were produced and packaged on Sept. 14-15, 2016. The following products are included in the recall:

  • 51.40-lb. of VACUUM-PACKED “BEEF GROUND COMPANY BURGER BLEND,” packed on 9/14/2016 with a lot number of “00028584” and case codes of 53085/CB136 in the upper left-hand corner of the label
  • 50.00-lb. of VACUUM-PACKED “BEEF GROUND COURSE STEAK TRIM,” packed on 9/14/2016 with a lot number of “00028582” and case codes of 53080/02300H in the upper left-hand corner of the label
  • 10.00-lb. of VACUUM-PACKED “BEEF GROUND FRESH,” packed on 9/14/2016 with a lot number of “00028583” and case codes of 53110/02300P in the upper left-hand corner of the label
  • 50.00-lb. VACUUM-PACKED “BEEF GROUND CHIMES FINE,” packed on 9/14/2016 with a lot number of “00028581” and case codes of 56660/02300C in the upper left-hand corner of the label
  • 51.46-lb. VACUUM-PACKED “BEEF GROUND COMPANY BURGER BLEND,” packed on 9/15/2016 with a lot number of “00028597” and case codes of 53085/CB136 in the upper left-hand corner of the label
  • 10.00-lb. VACUUM-PACKED “BEEF FAT OF RIB CAP,” packed on 9/15/2016, with a lot number of “00028595,” and case codes of 50010/1138 in the upper left-hand corner of the label
  • 10.83-lb. VACUUM-PACKED “BEEF GROUND CHUCK DAT DOG,” packed on 9/15/2016, with a lot number of “00028593,” and case codes of 56135/02150 in the upper left-hand corner of the label
  • 10.23-lb. VACUUM-PACKED “BEEF GROUND CHUCK BRISKET BURGER,” packed on 9/15/2016 with a lot number of “00028596,” and case codes of 53060/208116120 in the upper left-hand corner of the label
  • 5.00-lb. VACUUM-PACKED “BEEF STEAK CUBED 5#,” packed on 9/15/2016, with a lot number of “00028594,” and case codes of 50565/04902 in the upper left-hand corner of the label
  • 10.00-lb. VACUUM-PACKED “BEEF GROUND CHUCK 10#,” packed on 9/15/2016, with a lot number of “00028592,” and case codes of 53015/02100 in the upper left-hand corner of the label
  • 10.11-lb. VACUUM-PACKED “BEEF STEAK CUBED,” packed on 9/15/2016, with a lot number of “00028591,” and case codes of 50555/1100GJ in the upper left-hand corner of the label
  • 10.32-lb. VACUUM-PACKED “BEEF GROUND CHUCK BRISKET 8 oz.,” packed on 9/15/2016, with a lot number of “00028585,” and case codes of 53050/05M8 in the upper left-hand corner of the label
  • 9.98-lb. VACUUM-PACKED “VEAL SIRLOIN CUBED POLY BAGED,” packed on 9/15/2016, with a lot number of “00028590,” and case codes of 56070/0776 in the upper left-hand corner of the label

The recalled products bear establishment number “EST. M-22022” inside the USDA mark of inspection. These items were shipped to a distributor, as well as hotels, restaurants and other  institutions in Louisiana.

The rare E. coli  was discovered when the establishment received a positive STEC sample during their quarterly E. coli testing program on Sept. 29, 2016. There has not yet  been any  confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to consumption of these products.

Many clinical laboratories do not test for non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), such as STEC O26 because it is harder to identify than STEC O157. People can become ill from STECs 2–8 days (average of 3–4 days) after consuming the organism.

Most people infected with STEC O26 develop diarrhea (often bloody), and vomiting. Some illnesses last longer and can be more severe. Infection is usually diagnosed by testing of a stool sample. Vigorous rehydration and other supportive care is the usual treatment; antibiotic treatment is generally not recommended.

Most people recover within a week, but, rarely, some develop a more severe infection. Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is uncommon with STEC O26 infection. HUS can occur in people of any age but is most common in children under 5 years old, older adults and persons with weakened immune systems. It is marked by easy bruising, pallor, and decreased urine output. Persons who experience these symptoms should seek emergency medical care immediately.

FSIS and the company are concerned that some product may be frozen and in consumers’ freezers.

Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

FSIS routinely conducts recall effectiveness checks to verify recalling firms notify their customers of the recall and that steps are taken to make certain that the product is no longer available to consumers. When available, the retail distribution list(s) will be posted on the FSIS website.



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2e3KMI0

Tyson’s recalls popcorn chicken shipped with unwanted plastic

tysonpopcornchicken_406x250Tyson Foods at New Holland, PA Saturday recalled approximately 1,148 pounds of frozen popcorn chicken products that may be contaminated with extraneous materials, specifically hard plastic, according to  the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

The frozen, ready-to-eat, whole grain popcorn chicken items were produced on August 10, 2016. The following products are subject to recall:

  • 35 cases of 32.79-lb. “TYSON FULLY COOKED, WHOLE GRAIN GOLDEN CRISPY POPCORN CHICKEN, CHICKEN PATTIE FRITTERS” with a case code of “70368/928” on the upper right hand side of the label.

The products included in the  recall bear establishment number “P-1325” inside the USDA mark of inspection. These items were shipped to a wholesale distributor in Illinois and further distributed to schools and food services in Missouri and Illinois.

The problem was discovered when Tyson’s  received a consumer complaint from a school regarding foreign material, specifically hard plastic, found inside a bag of Tyson brand whole grain popcorn chicken product.

There has not yet  been any confirmed reports of injury or illness due to consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about an injury or illness should contact a healthcare provider.

Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

FSIS routinely conducts recall effectiveness checks to verify recalling firms notify their customers of the recall and that steps are taken to make certain that the product is no longer available to consumers. When available, the retail distribution list(s) will be posted on the FSIS website.



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2ehkH5Y

Thursday, October 13, 2016

FDA warns Wonderful Co. about pistachio processing plant

A California company has been warned by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to fully document any manufacturing changes it makes so that two Salmonella strains found in its pistachios and linked to a multistate outbreak this past spring will not recur.

Wonderful pistachios

For a complete list of all of the recalled pistachios, sold under the brands Wonderful, Trader Joe’s and Paramount Farms, please click on one of the images.

The FDA warning letter, dated Oct. 7, went to The Wonderful Co. owner, Stewart Resnick, and concerned Wonderful Pistachios processed at Paramount Farms at 13646 Highway 33 in Lost Hills, about 45 miles northwest of Bakersfield, CA.

The outbreak sickened at least 11 people in nine states and hospitalized two of them. No deaths were reported, according to a final update posted May 20 from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Among people for whom information was available, illnesses started on dates ranging from Jan. 3 to March 25. recalled Trader Joes pistachios from Paramount FarmsIll people ranged in age from 27 years to 69, with a median age of 41. Sixty-four percent of those sickened were male, according to CDC.

On March 9, The Wonderful Co. recalled various flavors and sizes of in-shell and shelled pistachios sold under the brand names Wonderful, Paramount Farms and Trader Joe’s. The recalled nuts were sold nationwide and in Canada, Mexico and Peru. The full list of recalled products is here.

Although CDC declared the outbreak investigation over back in May, since the recalled pistachios have a long shelf life and may still be in people’s homes, the agency noted that consumers unaware of the recall could continue to eat the products and get sick.

FDA’s San Francisco District Office in Alameda told Resnick in the warning letter that, following the Salmonella outbreak, investigators had inspected the company’s pistachio manufacturing process at the Lost Hills facility from March 8 through April 7.

“Based on traceback and epidemiological evidence taken together with inspectional evidence, we have concluded that pistachio nuts produced by your firm are adulterated within the meaning of …  the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act … in that they bear or contain Salmonella, a deleterious substance which may render them injurious to health …,” the letter stated.

“Based on collaborative epidemiological and investigational efforts between the FDA, CDC, and the California Department of Public Health, we conclude that pistachio nuts produced by Wonderful Pistachios & Almonds LLC were linked to this outbreak of Salmonella infections.”

Of the 11 people confirmed in the Salmonella outbreak, FDA stated that 10 were interviewed. Eight of the 10 reported eating pistachios during the week before they became ill, and five of those reported eating Wonderful brand pistachios. No other specific food was identified as a “suspect vehicle,” according to the warning letter.

Nuts from facility tested positive for outbreak strain
During FDA’s visit to Paramount Farms, inspectors collected three product samples, each consisting of 30 subsamples. In one sample of raw, in-shell pistachios collected from the facility’s silos, five of 30 subsamples yielded positive tests, four for Salmonella Senftenberg and one for Salmonella Liverpool, according to the warning letter.

“Whole genome sequencing determined that the Salmonella Senftenberg isolates were nearly identical to isolates from case patients involved in the outbreak. The most probable number in these subsamples ranged from less than 3 to 23 Salmonella cells/gram,” FDA wrote.

The agency’s letter acknowledged The Wonderful Co. recall of pistachio products and its written response to the inspection observations dated April 19. In that response, the company proposed to study the optimal chlorine level in its processing tanks and install a system to remove foreign material prior to moving the pistachios into storage, the warning letter stated.

“However, you did not provide us with documentation demonstrating the effectiveness of these changes and any other changes you have made to prevent a reoccurrence of an outbreak,” FDA noted, adding that it would need documentation, including photographs, of corrective actions taken to date and any other pertinent information that might help evaluate such corrections.

As of Thursday, FDA had not yet heard back from the Resnick, The Wonderful Co. or Paramount Farms, said Sergio Chavez, a compliance officer with the agency’s Alameda office. However, he pointed out that they have 15 working days from receiving the letter to do so.

In response to a request from Food Safety News, Steven Clark, vice president of corporate communications for The Wonderful Co., provided this statement regarding the warning letter:

“Yes, we were surprised to receive this communication from the FDA since we have not heard from them since early April when they inspected our facility. Other than the Oct. 7 letter, neither the FDA nor the CDC advised us of any further action required on our part. Moreover, the CDC closed their investigation last May.

“Though none of the Salmonella cases in question were directly linked to our product, we did voluntarily recall product in an abundance of caution, we implemented enhanced food safety protocols, and no new issues have surfaced. We will continue to cooperate with the FDA to satisfy any concerns they may have.”

Chavez explained that FDA can shut down a food facility by revoking its facility registration if it is found to present an imminent hazard to the public, adding, “that finding was not made in this particular instance.”

At this point, it’s not clear to FDA how the Salmonella bacteria got to the pistachios, but there are many potential ways it can happen, he said.

Pistachio nuts on tree

Immature pistachio nuts on tree.

“If we knew how it got in there, we would have put it in that letter,” he noted. “Even if they (the nuts) don’t hit the ground, they’re out in nature and birds do what they do, lizards do what they do. Anything that’s on the nuts is a potential source.”

Chlorine will kill most pathogens, including Salmonella, as long as it is applied in the appropriate concentration and the level is monitored, the water regularly changed, and the chlorine gets directly to where the bacteria are hiding, Chavez explained.

“When you’re talking about cleaning and sanitizing something, germs will hide under anything, including dirt, and if you apply surface sanitizer and it doesn’t penetrate that gunk layer, no matter how thick it may be, it won’t fix the problem,” he said.

FDA will be reinspecting the Paramount Farms facility at some point, although Chavez could not say when.

“For food, we rarely tell people,” he said. “There’s supposed to be compliance all of the time, not just when we come by.”

In addition to Paramount Farms, billionaire Resnick and his wife Lynda also own Pom Wonderful pomegranate juice, Halos brand mandarin oranges, Sweet Scarletts Texas red grapefruit, Fiji Water, the Teleflora flower-delivery service, Landmark and Justin wines, Suterra pest control, a large beekeeping farm and thousands of acres of California citrus, almond and pistachio orchards.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2e1bpfY

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Michigan company recalls 7 tons of cheese because of Listeria

More than seven tons of various kinds of cheese, packaged under three brands and distributed to five states is being recalled because of possible contamination with Listeria monocytogenes.

Kuster’s Inc. of Camden, MI, posted the recall with the Food and Drug Administration Wednesday evening after receiving notification from its supplier, Farm Country Cheese of Lakeview, MI, about the potential contamination.

To view labels of other varieties of cheese included in this recall, click on the image.

To view labels of other varieties of cheese included in this recall, click on the image.

The 14,238 pounds of shredded, sliced and cubed cheese was distributed in Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

“The recall was the result of confirmation from the cheese manufacturer of a possible contamination of the product received,” according to the recall notice. “Kuster’s Inc. has ceased production and distribution of the product as the FDA and the company continue their investigations.

“Kuster’s Inc. is complying with this recall and recalling any product that may have been processed on its manufacturing equipment after the cheese in question was processed.”

Consumers can identify the recalled cheese by label information that includes product dates found in the bottom center of package labels. Specific products recalled are:

Shredded cheese in 5-pound plastic bags under the following labels:

  • Kuster’s Dairy Foods Three Blend (pack date 10/05/16)
  • Fata’s Best Four Blend Feather Shred (lot date 27916)
  • Fata’s Best Mozzarella Muenster Provolone Feather Shred (lot date 27916)
  • Fata’s Best Monterey Jack Feather Shred (lot date 27916)
  • Fata’s Best PepperJack Feather Shred (Lot date 27816)
  • Nor-Tech Dairy  Mozz/Muenster/Prov Feather Shred (best used by: 12-05-2016)
  • Nor-Tech Dairy Sharp White Cheddar Feather Shred (packed on 10.04.2016)

Cubed cheese packaged under the following label:
Nor-Tech Dairy PepperJack 3/4″ Cubed (packed on 10/04/2016).

Sliced cheese packaged under the following label:
Kuster’s Dairy Foods Sliced Colby Jack

No illnesses had been reported in connection with the recalled cheese as of the posting of the recall notice Wednesday. Anyone who has eaten any of the recalled cheese and develop symptoms of Listeria infection should seek medical attention and tell their doctors about the possible exposure to Listeria monocytogenes.

Listeria monocytogenes can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems. Although healthy individuals may suffer only short-term symptoms such as high fever, severe headache, stiffness, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea. Listeria infection can cause miscarriages and stillbirths among pregnant women.

Consumers who have purchased any of these recalled products are urged not to eat the product and to return it to Kuster’s Inc. for a full refund. Customers with questions may contact the company at 517-368-5174.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2dNz0EW