Monday, August 28, 2017

Papaya pathogen problems persist

The CDC posted this photo with its outbreak notice, describing maradol papayas as large, oval fruits that weigh 3 or more pounds, with green skins that turn yellow when the fruit is ripe. The flesh inside the fruit is salmon-colored. Photo courtesy of CDC

Salmonella — the pathogen behind an ongoing foodborne illness outbreak that has sickened 173 people across 21 states, killing one — is a normal inhabitant of the intestinal tract of many birds, reptiles and mammals.

The possibility that an agricultural product such as papayas may be contaminated with Salmonella is impossible to eradicate; however, the risk of widespread contamination can be controlled through careful attention to current best sanitary practices in the cultivation, harvesting and packing of raw produce. Failure to do so can result in a vicious cycle of contamination in fields, packing houses and the distribution system.

Cultivation, harvesting and packing
The papaya is a fast-growing, tree-like herbaceous plant, which is at home in tropical and semi-tropical climates and is cultivated extensively across southeastern Mexico, according to a report issued by the University of Florida IFAS Extension Service. The most recent report from Mexico’s Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Food) shows Mexico to be the fifth largest producer of papayas in the world.

Papaya trees are propagated from seeds. When seedlings are large enough, they are transplanted by hand into growing fields.

The papaya plant is propagated from seeds, with seedlings transplanted into fields when they are of sufficient size. The plant matures in six to nine months in warmer regions. Susceptible to a variety of plant diseases and pests, such as root rot, powdery mildew, papaya ringspot virus, fruit fly and white fly, papaya plants usually have an abbreviated commercial lifespan of two to three years, according to information from the University of Hawaii. It is not unusual for a papaya plant to only produce a single crop in its lifetime.

Once harvested and delivered to the packing house, each papaya is graded according to ripeness and size. Next, the fruit is sorted according to size a second time, as well as shape, and color. It is also examined for insect or mechanical damage.

The sorted fruit is generally washed in large vats of chlorinated tap water to remove dirt, debris and insect contamination. Depending upon the condition of the fruit and the expected final destination, it may be subjected to additional treatments, including a hot water bath or a fungicide dip. After air-drying, the fruit is packed for shipment.

2011 Salmonella Agona outbreak
In 2011, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration investigated a Salmonella Agona outbreak that was traced to contaminated papayas imported from Mexico. The papayas were grown and packed by Agromod SA de CV of Chiapas, Mexico, and distributed by Agromod Produce Inc. of McAllen, Texas.

Photo illustration

The Agromod papaya plantation had an interconnected drainage ditch system, according to information presented in 2013 during the annual educational conference of the National Environmental Health Association (NEHA).

The marsh-like environment of the drainage ditches was a haven for waterfowl, frogs and other wildlife, and provided perfect growth conditions for pathogenic bacteria. During heavy rain and flooding, the ditches overflowed into the soil surrounding the trees, impregnating the soil with pathogens from the water.

During an on-site inspection of Agromod’s plantation and packing house, investigators from FDA recovered a full two dozen different types of Salmonella, including the Salmonella Agona outbreak strain. Salmonella-positive samples were drawn from fields where the papaya grew and from packing-house drains.

The crops at Agromod were harvested by two-person teams. One person worked at tree level, picking fruit and handing or tossing it to the other person below. The second person laid each papaya onto a piece of poly foam on the unprotected soil. The foam was wrapped around the fruit, which was loaded into foam-lined bins for transport to the packing house.

Photo illustration

It was common practice at Agromod for the sheets of poly foam to be reused for up to 15 days before being discarded, helping to spread contamination from the fields to the fruit, packing house and back again.

Once in the packing house, the fruit was washed in large vats of water. The level of chlorine in the wash water was not properly monitored or controlled, allowing Salmonella to spread throughout an entire batch of papayas.

The wash water was discharged into the drainage ditch system, returning Salmonella to the fields in a vicious cycle of contamination.

Import Alert
In response to the extent of Salmonella contamination brought to light during the investigation of the 2011 outbreak, FDA instituted Import Alert #21-17, “Countrywide Detention Without Physical Examination Of Papaya From Mexico.” Firms that provided documentation of five consecutive Salmonella-negative commercial shipments qualified for an exemption from the automatic detention at the U.S. border.

Concurrent with FDA’s initiation of the Import Alert, Mexico’s Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (National Service for Health, Safety and Agrifood Quality) (SENASICA ) unveiled a plan to assist that country’s papaya growers, packers and shippers in addressing the issues of safe growing and handling of the fruit.

History repeats
Notwithstanding the efforts of multiple agencies in both countries, the United States is once again in the throes of an outbreak of Salmonella that is associated with consumption of fresh, whole papayas imported from Mexico.

To view a larger version of the map on the CDC’s website, please click on the image.

As of Aug. 18 when the CDC posted it’s most recent outbreak update, 173 people had been confirmed sick across 21 states, with 58 hospitalizations, and one death on New York City. The CDC warns that the number of confirmed illnesses is likely to increase.

Thus far FDA has identified one farm in connection with the contaminated papaya. That farm, Carica de Campeche, has been supplying papayas to the U.S. market under an Import Alert exemption since 2015.

According to a spokesperson from FDA, at present there are no specific ongoing testing or inspection requirements that a producer must meet in order to maintain an exemption from automatic detention, although a firm is expected to “… continue to provide the commodity in a wholesome manner and follow all the regulatory requirements of FDA.”

The FDA revoked the exemption granted to Carica de Campeche under Import Alert 21-17 was revoked on Aug. 7.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2wEd4DE

Sunday, August 27, 2017

Bacteria, undeclared milk top causes for recalls during 2Q

Courtesy of Stericycle

After three consecutive quarters with 200 or more food recalls under the Food and Drug Administration’s jurisdiction, the second quarter of 2017 broke the trend.

From May through June this year the there were 178 food recalls of FDA-regulated products in the U.S., according to a report compiled by Stericycle Expert Solutions Inc. That’s an 11 percent decline compared to the first three months of 2017. Even with that decrease, Q2 for 2017 still saw more food recalls of FDA regulated foods logged than were recorded from Q1 of 2013 through Q2 of 2016.

In the realm of meat, poultry and certain egg products, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s records showed a 47 percent increase in recalls for 2Q this year compared to the same period in 2016. The USDA posted 47 recalls from May through June this year, the second highest number for a three-month period since 2005, according to Stericycle’s quarterly report.

While individual units recalled under FDA regulations dropped about 3 percent compared with 2Q of 2016, with about 89.3 million units pulled, the USDA — which measures recalls in pounds rather than units — saw a 307 percent increase. From May through June this year USDA supervised the recall of more than 10.2 million pounds of meat, poultry and egg products.

For both FDA and USDA, the second quarter this year saw more volume recalled than was pulled during 18 of the past 21 quarters, Stericycle reported.

Undeclared milk was responsible for the vast majority of the volume of food recalled under the USDA’s regulations during the 2Q this year, accounting for 80.9 percent of the foods recalled under USDA jurisdiction. In the first three months of 2017 less than 1 percent of USDA recalls were because of undeclared milk.

The primary cause of the milk allergen recalls was the failure of a bread/cracker crumb supplier to declare milk on its products’ labels, which resulted in producers downstream failing to declare milk on their labels.

On the FDA side, bacterial contamination was the reason behind the recall of 86.6 percent of the food units pulled under the supervision of the agency. The remaining 13.4 percent of FDA recalls were because of undeclared allergens at 8.4 percent of the total, foreign material at 4.8 percent and “other” at 0.2 percent.

Of the FDA-regulated foods recalled during 2Q this year, 70 percent were prepared foods, which only accounted for 2.9 percent of FDA recalls during the first three months of 2017. Other highlights from the second quarter report include:

FDA recalls by categories

  • Prepared foods 23.6 percent;
  • Dairy 11.2 percent;
  • Seafood 10.1 percent; and
  • Supplements 10.1 percent.

USDA recalls by pounds

  • Poultry 72.3 percent;
  • Multiple ingredients 18.8 percent;
  • Beef 6.3 percent; and
  • Pork 1.7 percent.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2xpftzw

Saturday, August 26, 2017

Blossom Foods recalls beef for misbranding and allergens

Blossom Foods, LLC,  located in Oakland, CA, is recalling approximately 15,092 pounds of beef, chicken and pork products due to misbranding and undeclared allergens, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

The products contain soy and wheat, known allergens, which are not declared on the product label.  The frozen assorted meat and poultry items were produced from Aug. 23, 2016, to Aug. 23, 2017, and bear an expiration date that is one year from the date of packaging.

Subject to recall are:

  • 6.6-lb. case of “Barbequed Beef, Corn, Baked Beans”
  • 5.5-lb. case of “Barbeque Beef”
  • 10-lb. case of “Savory Beef”
  • 5.5-lb. case of “Sesame chicken
  • 10-lb. case of “Spanish Beef”
  • 5.5-lb. case of “Barbeque Pork”
  • 5.5-lb. case of “Breakfast Sausage”
  • 10-lb. case of “Beef”
  • 6.5-lb. case of “Chicken and Dumplings, Peas, Rutabaga”

Products subject to recall bear establishment number “EST. 51200” or “P-51200” inside the USDA mark of inspection. These items were shipped to institutional locations in California and Ohio.

The mistake was discovered on Aug. 22, 2017, when FSIS Inspection Program Personnel observed that the establishment utilizes a soy protein concentrate in the production of several products, but the finished product labels do not declare soy. In addition, some of the same products contain wheat flour and wheat is also not declared on the finished product labels.

There have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about an injury or illness should contact a healthcare provider.  Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

FSIS routinely conducts recall effectiveness checks to verify recalling firms notify their customers of the recall and that steps are taken to make certain that the product is no longer available to consumers. When available, the retail distribution list(s) will be posted on the FSIS website.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2xC2IAQ

Canadian pork bellies shipped to Hawaii recalled for lack of inspection

Toronto-based Ronald A. Chisholm, Ltd. has recalled approximately 12,169 pounds of skinless pork belly products that were not presented at the U.S. point of entry for inspection, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

Without the benefit of full inspection, a possibility of adverse health consequences exists.

The recalled products were produced and packaged from June 27, 2017, to July 20, 2017, and include:

  • Approximately 40-lb. cardboard box containing “FLANC PORC, PORK BELLY.”

Products subject to the recall bear case code “815157” and establishment number “10” inside the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) mark of inspection. These items were shipped to restaurants in Hawaii.

The problem was discovered on Aug. 23, 2017, by FSIS while conducting routine failure to present monitoring activities. FSIS discovered that a shipment of skinless pork belly products had entered the United States from Canada on or about July 29, 2017, and did not receive import inspection. The products were distributed to a single distributor and three federal establishments.

There have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about a reaction should contact a healthcare provider.

Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

FSIS routinely conducts recall effectiveness checks to verify recalling firms notify their customers of the recall and that steps are taken to make certain that the product is no longer available to consumers. When available, the retail distribution list(s) will be posted on the FSIS website.



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2wdUQ9f

Wednesday, August 23, 2017

New York dairy recalls cheese after positive test for Listeria 

A Cayuga County, NY, dairy is recalling three kinds of cheese because it has tested positive for Listeria, which can cause serious infections.

Photos from the Hillcrest Dairy Facebook page show the company’s logo and some of its products.

food safety alert posted by the New York State Department of Agriculture warns consumers not to eat “Old Fashioned Raw Milk Monterey Jack,” “Horseradish Monterey Jack” or “Chipotle Adobo Monterey Jack” cheeses, produced by Ripley Dairy LLC, doing business as Hillcrest Dairy in Moravia,NY.

“A routine sample of the cheese, taken by an inspector from the Division of Milk Control and Dairy Services on Aug. 9, was subsequently tested by the New York State Food Laboratory. It tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes,” according to the food safety alert.

Test results from the dairy were confirmed on Aug. 17.

In a statement posted on the Hillcrest Dairy Facebook page Wednesday, spokeswoman Shari Ripley “stricter testing policies have been put in place to insure all cheese leaving our facility has been thoroughly tested to provide you the safest product possible.”

The recalled products, which are packaged in plastic shrink wrap and labeled with the plant number 36-3108, have a manufacture date of May 17, 2017, on their labels.

Hillcrest Dairy says it will destroy the affected cheese.

It is not legal to sell raw milk products at the retail level in New York, under the Division of Milk Control & Dairy Services Raw Milk Sales guidelines. Direct sales to consumers are allowed at dairies. However, warning signs are mandatory.

“Notice: Raw milk sold here, raw milk does not provide the protection of pasteurization.'”

Anyone who has recently consumed the dairy products from Ripley Dairy LLC, dba Hillcrest Dairy, and developed symptoms of Listeria infection should immediately seek medical attention. Patients should tell their doctors about the possible exposure to Listeria bacteria so that the proper diagnostic tests can be performed.

It can take up to 70 days after exposure for symptoms to develop, so anyone who has eaten any of the recalled cheese since Mid-May is urged to monitor themselves for symptoms.

Symptoms of listeriosis can include fever, muscle aches, headache, stiff neck, confusion, loss of balance and convulsions sometimes preceded by diarrhea or other gastrointestinal symptoms. An invasive infection spreads beyond the gastrointestinal tract.

In pregnant women, the infection can cause miscarriages, stillbirths, premature delivery or life-threatening infection of the newborn. Listeriosis is treated with antibiotics.

Listeriosis can also cause serious, sometimes fatal, infections in young children, older adults, people with weakened immune systems, including cancer patients.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2xf0sjF

More than 10 tons of chicken kabobs recalled for Listeria

A Canadian company is recalling more than 20,000 pounds of chicken skewer products from U.S. stores because American officials found Listeria monocytogenes during a routine foreign shipment inspection.

Expresco Foods Inc. of Montréal, Québec, distributed the 20,446 pounds of “fully cooked chicken skewer items” before the recall notice was posted by the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) on Wednesday.

Both Expresco and West End Cuisine brand chicken kabobs are included in the recall. Expresco produced the products on Aug. 9 and 15.

The FSIS reported that the recalled products were distributed to retail locations in Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan and Texas. When available, the retail distribution list(s) will be posted on the FSIS website at http://ift.tt/1gO8Ec3.

Consumers can identify the recalled chicken skewers by looking for the following packaging information:

  • 1.31-pound packages of “WEST END CUISINE GRILLED MEDITERRANEAN STYLE CHICKEN SKEWERS HAND-MADE WITH CHICKEN BREAST” with the UPC number 621588314947 and a lot code of 172562, 172640, 172571 or 172704; and
  • 1.09-pound packages of “EXPRESCO GRILLED Garlic & Herb CHICKEN SKEWERS” with the UPC number 621588315555 and a lot code of 172563, 172668, 172669 or 172670.

The recalled chicken products also have the establishment number “36” printed inside the “mark of inspection” of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA).

As of Wednesday, there had not been any confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to consumption of these products, according to the recall notice. However, it can take up to 70 days after exposure for symptoms of Listeria infection to develop, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“FSIS and the company are concerned that some product may be frozen and in consumers’ freezers,” according to the recall notice.

“Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.”

Anyone who has eaten any of the recalled chicken and developed symptoms of Listeria infection should seek medical attention and tell their doctors about the possible exposure to the bacteria.

Similarly, anyone who has eaten or handled the recalled chicken should monitor themselves for symptoms during the 70-day incubation period. Symptoms can include high fever, severe headache, stiffness, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea.

Although healthy adults may suffer only short-term symptoms, listeria infection can cause miscarriages and stillbirths among pregnant women. It often causes serious, sometimes fatal, infections in high-risk groups. People at higher risk include children, the elderly, cancer patients and anyone with a surpassed or compromised immune system.

Consumers with questions regarding the recall can contact Garry Arpin, Expresco Foods Inc. communications director, at 514-843-2353.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2wzTskn

Walmart’s Great Value frozen cherries recalled for listeria risk

Some frozen, organic, sweet, pitted cherries packaged under Walmart’s Great Value brand are under recall after producer Sunrise Growers Inc. found Listeria monocytogenes during routine testing.

Distribution details — such cities and states — were incomplete in the recall notice, posted Wednesday on the Food and Drug Administration’s website. Sunrise Growers shipped the frozen organic cherries on Aug. 10.

“These recalled products were distributed to a customer distribution center in Louisiana and may have been redistributed to stores in Louisiana and Mississippi,” according to the recall notice, which did not name Walmart.

“The affected retail customer has been notified of this recall and instructed to remove any recalled product from retail store shelves and inventories.”

No illnesses had been confirmed in connection with the recalled frozen, organic cherries as of the posting of the recall on the FDA website. However, it can take up to 70 days after exposure for symptoms of Listeria infection to develop, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Also, because of the best-by date for the frozen organic cherries is two years away, there is concern that consumers may have unused portions of the recalled fruit in their homes.

“Consumers are urged not to consume these products. Consumers who purchased these products may take them back to the store where they purchased them for a refund or simply discard them,” according to the recall notice.

Only Great Value branded 32-ounce plastic zip-top bags of frozen, organic, dark sweet pitted cherries are subject to this recall. To determine whether cherries they have in their homes are included in the recall, consumers should the bags for the following information:

  • Best By Date of 08/10/19 on the back of the bag;
  • UPC number of 078742126166; and
  • Lot code FED722211 or FED722212.

Anyone who has eaten any of the recalled cherries and developed symptoms of Listeria infection should seek medical attention and tell their doctors about the possible exposure to the bacteria.

Similarly, anyone who has eaten or handled the recalled cherries should monitor themselves for symptoms during the 70-day incubation period. Symptoms can include high fever, severe headache, stiffness, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea.

Although healthy adults may suffer only short-term symptoms, listeria infection can cause miscarriages and stillbirths among pregnant women. It often causes serious, sometimes fatal, infections in high-risk groups. People at higher risk include children, the elderly, cancer patients and anyone with a surpassed or compromised immune system.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2vhgxUx

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Breakfast Best brand sausage recalled for Listeria concerns

Fair Oaks Farms LLC in Pleasant Prairie, WI, has recalled 1,134 pounds of pork sausage patties after its internal testing returned positive results for Listeria monocytogenes, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

FSIS and the company are concerned that some product may be frozen and in consumers’ freezers.

Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

The fully cooked pork sausage patties were produced on Aug. 8. The specific product recalled can be identified by the following label information:

  • 2-lb. plastic sleeve packages containing “BREAKFAST Best FULLY COOKED ORIGINAL PORK SAUSAGE PATTIES,” with a sell-by date of 05/15/2018.

The products subject to recall bear establishment number “EST. 17479T” above the sell by date. Fair Oaks shipped the sausage patties to distribution and retail locations in Illinois, Iowa and Wisconsin. Further distribution details were not included in the recall notice. When available, retail distribution lists will be posted on the FSIS website.

The contamination was discovered when firm’s routine testing indicated positive results for Listeria monocytogenes. The products were on hold at a distribution center, however, the products were inadvertently shipped. No confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to consumption of these products had been reported as of the posting of the notice on Tuesday.

Consumption of food contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes bacteria can cause listeriosis, a serious infection that can be fatal for young children, older adults, people with weakened immune systems, and pregnant women and their newborns. Healthy adults can also be infected, but they usually recover.

Anyone who has eaten any of the recalled Breakfast Best brand sausage and developed symptoms of Listeria infection should seek medical attention and tell their doctors about their possible exposure to the bacteria. It can take up to 70 days after exposure for symptoms to develop.

Symptoms of listeriosis can include fever, muscle aches, headache, stiff neck, confusion, loss of balance and convulsions sometimes preceded by diarrhea or other gastrointestinal symptoms. An invasive infection spreads beyond the gastrointestinal tract.

In pregnant women, the infection can cause miscarriages, stillbirths, premature delivery or life-threatening infection of the newborn. Listeriosis is treated with antibiotics. Persons in the higher-risk categories who experience flu-like symptoms within 70 days after eating contaminated food should seek medical care and tell the health care provider about eating the contaminated food.

 

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2v46PZF

Saturday, August 19, 2017

Target just says ‘no’ to Just brand from Hampton Creek Inc.

Apparently the “Just” brand of plant-based mayo and other processed foods will not be returning to the shelves of a Target store near you any time soon, according to the CEO of Hampton Creek Inc., which produces the products.

Saying he was surprised, Jeff Tetrick, who co-founded San Francisco-based Hampton Creek in 2011 with Josh Balk, posted a statement on the company’s website blaming the break between the companies on Target Brands Inc.

“To our suprise (sic), Target informed us that sharing with the public the FDA’s conclusion that our products are safe somehow violated Target’s vendor communication guidelines,” according to Tetrick’s statement. “Target told us this is what drove their decision to end our relationship…”

The Food and Drug Administration’s conclusion came after an investigation launched in late June after Target suddenly pulled all Hampton Creek products from its shelves nationwide. At the time, Target officials declined to provide details, except a for a one-sentence written statement.

“Pending a full review, Target started a market withdrawal of Hampton Creek products, which are being removed from Target stores and target.com,” a Target spokeswoman told Food Safety News via email in June. Bloomberg news reported the retailer had received information that there were food safety issues and possible adulteration of Hampton Creek products.

On Aug. 7 the communications director for Hampton Creek reported the FDA had notified the company that it was closing its investigation. The next day an FDA spokeswoman confirmed that the agency did not have any more questions for Hampton Creek and “considers this matter closed.”

Target’s spokeswoman said at that time the retailer was still reviewing the situation. The results of that review became evident when Hampton Creek’s CEO posted his undated statement online in recent days.

“With Target telling the media they stopped selling our products because of food safety issues, we felt there was a necessity to share the FDA’s conclusion, so we did. We shared a simple message: The FDA has no safety concerns, and the matter is closed. We shared it for our consumers, for partners, and for our team.”

Bloomberg news reported a slightly different version of the retailer’s decision on Friday.

“Although the FDA is not pursuing this further, we used the opportunity to review our portfolio, as we regularly do, and decided to reconsider our relationship with Hampton Creek,” Jenna Reck, a spokeswoman for Target, wrote in an email to Bloomberg on Friday.

“We are not planning to bring Hampton Creek products back to Target and have openly communicated our decision with the Hampton Creek team.”

In his recent online statement about Target, the Hampton Creek CEO referenced poison pen letters that Bloomberg news reported in June had been sent to retailers carrying Hampton Creek food products.

“More than a month ago, Target was led to believe via a fraudulent letter that several of our products were mislabeled or unsafe. The company withdrew our products with little warning, saying that they’ll bring them back once the FDA clears them as safe. We were confident that our products were safe and properly labeled,” Tetrick’s statement says.

Tetrick reports Hampton Creek has a list of “partners” still carrying Just brand products, including Walmart, ShopRite, Publix, Safeway, HEB, Ahold, Kroger, Whole Foods, Amazon and Compass Group.



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2wdrE4A

Friday, August 18, 2017

Papaya Salmonella outbreak continues to spread; 21 states hit

The Salmonella outbreak traced to whole, fresh papayas from a farm in Southern Mexico continues to spread, with a 25 percent increase in victims in the past week.

Two more states are reporting confirmed illnesses in the outbreak, Missouri and Tennessee, bringing the total to 21 states involved with 173 victims, including one in New York who has died.

As of today, four types of Salmonella bacteria have been confirmed in lab work from outbreak victims, according to an update from the Centers for Disease control and Prevention.

The four types of Salmonella confirmed by the CDC are Kiambu, Thompson, Agona and Gaminara.

The Food and Drug Administration has confirmed all four of those types, as well as Salmonella Senftenberg, on papayas from the Carica de Campeche farm in Mexico.

“The FDA is advising that consumers avoid Caribeña, Cavi and Valery brands of Maradol papayas, and all varieties of papayas from the Carica de Campeche farm located in Campeche, Mexico, as a result of the FDA’s traceback investigation and testing,” according to the agency’s outbreak investigation update today.

“Thus far, Salmonella strains matching the outbreak patterns by PFGE (pulsed-field gel electrophoresis) were only isolated from papayas from the Carica de Campeche farm.”

All papayas from the implicated farm have been under an Import Alert from FDA since Aug. 8, meaning they are being held at the border and not allowed into the U.S.

However, because of the relatively long shelf life of the whole, fresh fruit, there may still be recalled papayas in consumers’ homes. Both FDA and CDC are urging consumers to throw out maradol papayas or the three recalled brands.

If consumers, retailers, restaurants or other foodservice operators aren’t sure of the brand, farm of origin, and variety of papayas they have on hand, they should not eat or serve them: When in doubt, throw it out is the advice from public health officials.

“The FDA and state partners continue to investigate the distribution of the papayas involved in this outbreak and are working to ensure that there are no other brand(s) that these papayas may have been sold under,” FDA reported today.

“The FDA increased testing of papayas from Mexico in an effort to see if fruit from other farms could be contaminated. If the FDA finds Salmonella in other shipments, those farms will also be added to Import Alert 99-35.”

Illnesses in the ongoing outbreak started on dates ranging from May 17 through July 31, 2017. Ill people range in age from less than 1 year to 95, with a median age of 38. Some information is not available for all of the ill people, according to the CDC.

However, for those with available information, two-thirds are Hispanic. Out of 136 victims whose status is known, almost half — 43 percent — have had symptoms so severe that they had to be hospitalized.

Health officials expect more victims to be identified because people who became ill after July 18 might not be reported yet because of the time it takes between when a person becomes ill and when the illness is reported, CDC reported. This takes an average of two to four weeks.

The 21 states involved so far, and the number of outbreak victims in each state, are as follows: Connecticut 6, Delaware 4, Iowa 2, Illinois 3, Kentucky 4, Louisiana 1, Maryland 8, Massachusetts 8, Michigan 1, Minnesota 4, Missouri 1, North Carolina 5, New Jersey 36, New York 50, Ohio 1, Oklahoma 4, Pennsylvania 8, Tennessee 1, Texas 9, Virginia 16, Wisconsin 1.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2wpuweD

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

Recall expanded: Raspberry mousse cakes linked to outbreak

Canadian officials have expanded a recall of raspberry mousse cakes linked to a norovirus outbreak, saying at least six additional provinces are involved, and possibly the entire country.

Five brands and unbranded raspberry mousse cakes are included in the recall, originally posted Aug. 11 and expanded Wednesday.

To view additional photos of recalled raspberry mousse cakes, please click on the image.

“This additional information was identified during the Canadian Food Inspection Agency’s (CFIA) food safety investigation,” according to the expanded recall notice.

“Consumers should not consume and retailers, hotels, restaurants and institutions should not sell, or serve the recalled products described below. … These products may also have been sold frozen or refrigerated, or clerk-served from bakery-pastry counters with or without a label or coding.”

Canadian federal officials are urging retailers, hotels, restaurants and institutions to check the labels of raspberry mousse cakes they have on hand or check with their suppliers to determine if they have the affected product.

Anyone who has recently eaten raspberry mousse cake and developed symptoms of norovirus is urged to seek medical attention.

Symptoms of norovirus infection are diarrhea, vomiting, nausea and stomach cramps. Other symptoms may include low-grade fever, headache, chills, muscle aches and fatigue. In severe cases, patients may need to be hospitalized and given fluids intravenously.

“People with norovirus illness usually develop symptoms of gastroenteritis within 24 to 48 hours, but symptoms can start as early as 12 hours after exposure. The illness often begins suddenly. Even after having the illness, you can still become re-infected by norovirus, according to the recall notice.

Brand Name Common Name Size Code(s) on Product UPC
Michaud Citrus-raspberry greek
yogurt mousse
650g 1667, 1777, 1997, 2017, 2077 0 620737 001806
Jessica Chocolate Raspberry
Mousse Cake
650g All products sold up to and
including August 11, 2017
Variable
None Raspberry Mousse 35g 17193 Variable
None Raspberry Dream Cake 1070g 17192 Variable
None Chocolate Raspberry
Mousse Cake
650g 17185 Variable
Laura Secord Red Berry Chocolate
Mousse Cake
90g 17201 Variable
Laura Secord Red Berry Chocolate
Mousse Cake
85g 17201 Variable
Laura Secord Red Berries Chocolate
Mousse Cake
485g 17201 Variable
Top Dessert Mousse sampler cake 725g 17170, 17185 Variable

 

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2vESz8q

Washington dairy recalls raw milk after positive test for E. coli

A dairy that has a history of pathogen problems is recalling unpasteurized, raw milk because it has tested positive for E. coli, which can cause serious infections, especially in young children.

Owners of Spanish Sunrise Dairy in Yacolt, WA, posted the recall Tuesday. The recalled unpasteurized milk has a best-by date of Aug. 23, so there is concern that consumers may have unused portions of it in their homes.

“Consumers who have purchased Spanish Sonrise Dairy raw milk with a Best By date of 08-23 are urged not to drink the product and return it to the place of purchase for a full refund,” according to the recall notice on the Washington State Department of Agriculture’s website.

The product, which was bottled in half-gallon glass containers, was sold directly to private customers and at one retail location, Camas Produce in Camas, WA. The dairy has ceased its raw milk operations, said Hector Castro, a spokesman for the agriculture department.

The dairy owners initiated the recall after routine sampling conducted by the department revealed the presence of toxin-producing E. coli in raw cream processed from whole raw milk. Spanish Sonrise Dairy and WSDA continue to work jointly to address the source of the problem, according to the recall notice.

Anyone who has recently consumed unpasteurized milk or other raw dairy products from Spanish Sonrise Dairy and developed symptoms of E. coli infection should immediately seek medical attention. Patients should tell their doctors about the possible exposure to E. coli bacteria so that the proper diagnostic tests can be performed.

Symptoms of E. coli infection often begin slowly with mild belly pain or non-bloody diarrhea that worsens over several days, often becoming bloody. Victims usually develop symptoms three to four days after the exposure, but incubation time varies from one to 10 days.

“The infection sometimes causes hemolytic uremic syndrome, a serious disease in which red blood cells are destroyed and the kidneys fail. Infants, children, pregnant women, the elderly and those with compromised immune systems are especially at risk,” according to the Spanish Sonrise Dairy recall notice.

A history of problems
This is not the first time Spanish Sonrise Dairy owners Tina and Jose Rodriguez have had pathogen problems with their unpasteurized dairy products.

In April 2015 the dairy owners recalled raw milk and other unpasteurized dairy products from consumers and several retailers after state lab tests showed contamination with Listeria monocytogenes. Later that month local media reported the owners were closing up shop.

“My husband and I had already decided we were going to sell it (the dairy) in one to five years or so anyway, so we just decided why not do it now,” Tina Rodriguez told The Reflector newspaper in Battle Ground, WA, in April 2015.

The Rodriguez couple filed incorporation documents with the state of Washington in July 2011. The registration expired in July 2014 and was changed to “inactive” status in November that year. The state agriculture department does not routinely review the incorporation status of food-related businesses under its jurisdiction. It does, however, keep track of licensing status.

“Our records show the firm went out of business for retail raw milk products during the April 2015 recall, and didn’t apply for relicensing until November 2016,” Castro told Food Safety News on Wednesday afternoon.

“(They were) licensed on Nov. 30, 2016, (and were) operational for retail raw cow products in January 2017 and for retail raw goat milk in February 2017.”

Retail raw milk is legal to sell and buy in Washington State, but the potential health risks are serious. Consumers should read the warning label on the retail raw milk container carefully and ask their retailer to verify the milk was produced and processed by a WSDA-licensed operation, according to the recall notice posted Tuesday.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)

 



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2v3wDAu

Tuesday, August 15, 2017

Cumberland Farms chicken Caesar salad recalled for allergen

Missa Bay LLC of Swedesboro, NJ, has recalled 1,719 pounds of chicken Caesar salad products because of misbranding and an undeclared allergen, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

The product contains wheat, a known allergen, which is not declared on the product label as required by federal law. The chicken Caesar salad product was produced on Aug. 1.

Consumers can identify the recalled product by the following label information:

  • 9.95 oz. plastic salad bowls containing “Cumberland FARMS CHICKEN CAESAR SALAD with ROMAINE LETTUCE, ROASTED CHICKEN, PARMESAN CHEESE, BACON, MULTIGRAIN CROUTONS & CREAMY CAESAR DRESSING” with the bar code 042704 034301 and a use-by date of Aug. 16.

The product subject to recall bears establishment number “P18502B” on the front of the product label. These items were shipped to Cumberland Farms retail locations in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont.

The problem was discovered when the establishment received notification from a retailer that the incorrect ingredient label was applied to the chicken caesar salad products. The ingredient label has a statement that the products were made without gluten containing ingredients, however, the “Chicken Caesar Salad” contains croutons made with wheat.

Cumberland Farms, the sole retailer of the Missa Bay product, released a recall statement Aug. 9, informing consumers of the product misbranding. FSIS posted its own recall notice Tuesday.

There hadn’t been any confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to consumption of this product as of Tuesday. Anyone concerned about an injury or illness should contact a healthcare provider.

Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

FSIS routinely conducts recall effectiveness checks to verify recalling firms notify their customers of the recall and that steps are taken to make certain that the product is no longer available to consumers.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2w8O4om

Monday, August 14, 2017

Michigan farm recalls shell eggs because of Salmonella

A poultry farm in Michigan is reportedly recalling shell eggs in eight counties because they may be contaminated with Salmonella enteriditis, which was found at the farm during an outbreak investigation.

As of Monday night it was not known if the recalled eggs have white or brown shells. Photo illustration

Neither the state agriculture department nor the state health department had posted any information about the recall as of Monday night, but area media was reporting that LaBar Poultry Farm in Manistique on the upper peninsula had recalled eggs distributed to restaurants, grocery stores and directly to consumers.

The eight counties implicated are Alger, Delta, Dickinson, Luce, Mackinac, Marquette, Menominee and Schoolcraft, according to The Sault News of Sault Ste. Marie, MI. Consumers can identify the eggs, which are packaged in dozen-count cartons, by looking for the LaBar Poultry Farm name and dates of Aug. 30 or Sept. 30, the newspaper reported.

Whether the recalled eggs are related to a Salmonella enteriditis outbreak Michigan officials were investigating in early July among patrons of a restaurant in Marquette County was not clear Monday evening. Patrick L. Jacuzzo, the Marquette County director of environmental health, told Food Safety News in July that raw, unpasteurized eggs served in Hollandaise sauce with eggs Benedict were the suspected source.

Jacuzzo said Michigan’s agriculture department was investigating an egg producer but that test results were not available at that time. He did not name the egg producer or the restaurant. Officials from the agriculture department did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

LeBar Poultry Farm is owned by Jeff and Heidi LaBar, according to Michigan state records. The farm’s Facebook page was not activated Monday night. The Detroit Free Press reported in August 2014 that Jeff LaBar won $3.3 million on a lottery ticket.

The Sault News reported Monday evening that Salmonella enteritidis was detected on the LaBar farm during environmental sampling as part of a foodborne illness outbreak investigation. Consumers and retail establishments who have purchased the eggs are urged not to eat them and to dispose of the product immediately.

Anyone who has eaten LaBar Poultry Farm brand eggs and developed symptoms of Salmonella infection should immediately seek medical attention and tell their doctors of the possible exposure to the proper diagnostic tests can be preformed.

Symptoms may include vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal cramping and sometimes fever and usually develop 12 to 72 hours after infection, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The illness usually lasts four to seven days, and most people recover without treatment. However, in some cases, the diarrhea may be so severe that patients need to be hospitalized. Serious and sometimes fatal infections and side effects occur in children, the elderly, pregnant women and people with compromised immune systems.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2wLdgye

Texas investigates brucellosis, warns against K-Bar raw milk

Texas officials say all raw milk and other unpasteurized products from K-Bar Dairy should not be consumed and should immediately be discarded because the dairy has been linked to an antibiotic-resistant strain of Brucella bacteria that has hospitalized at least one person.

“At this time, it is uncertain how long Brucella (bacteria) may have been present in the raw milk from this dairy. Testing is ongoing in an attempt to answer that question,” according to the Monday alert from the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS).

Especially at risk is anyone who has consumed raw milk or other unpasteurized dairy products from K-Bar Dairy, which is in Paradise, TX, since June 1. These individuals are considered to be at high risk of contracting brucellosis.

However, all unpasteurized dairy products sold since Jan. 1 this year are suspect at this point. Anyone who has become ill this year after consuming raw dairy products from K-Bar should seek medical attention, even if the symptoms have subsided, according to the state health alert.

The health department did not indicate whether the dairy, which is licensed for on-farm sales of unpasteurized milk, is continuing to operate. Owners of K-Bar did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday.

The K-Bar Dairy website did not have any information about the state warning as of Monday evening. The Facebook and Twitter pages for the family-owned operation were not operational Monday evening.

In addition to raw milk, K-Bar Dairy offers unpasteurized cream, cheese, yogurt and other dairy products. Texas officials are urging consumers to throw out any and all unpasteurized, raw dairy products from the Paradise, TX, dairy.

Alert urges doctors to be on watch
Brucellosis, the illness caused by the Brucella bacteria, is relatively rare and can be difficult to diagnose, Texas health officials warned, because many physicians are not familiar with the symptoms. Specific lab tests are also required to confirm the infection.

“If a patient seeks consultation because they consumed raw milk or raw milk products from this dairy between January and June, 2017 they should be advised to be watchful for signs of chronic Brucellosis and clinically evaluated as appropriate,” the Texas health alert recommended to doctors and nurses.

“As a healthcare professional, we ask you to familiarize yourself with Brucellosis, since it is an uncommon infection and can present with a wide variety of non-specific symptoms and signs that can wax and wane over weeks or even months.”

Initial symptoms can include fever, sweats, malaise, anorexia, headache, pain in muscles, joint, and/or back, and fatigue.

Some signs and symptoms may persist for longer periods of time. Others may never go away or reoccur. These can include recurrent fevers, arthritis, swelling of the testicle and scrotum area, inflammation of the heart, chronic fatigue, depression and swelling of the liver and spleen. Neurologic symptoms develop in up to 5 percent of all cases, according to the Texas health department.

Brucellosis is particularly dangerous during pregnancy and can result in is premature delivery, miscarriage or intrauterine infection with fetal death. Neonatal infection may occur through transplacental transmission or through breastfeeding.

“Treatment consists of combination antibiotic therapy. Depending on the timing of treatment and severity of illness, recovery may take a few weeks to several months,” according to the alert.

Although the symptoms can linger and victims can have lasting complications, death from brucellosis is rare, occurring in no more than 2 percent of all cases, the Texas health department reported.

The index patient
Described by public health officials as the index patient, the person who is currently hospitalized with a brucellosis infection has had symptoms of fever, fatigue and pain in muscles and joints. A blood culture test was necessary to diagnose the infection.

“The strain of Brucella recovered from the index patient in this case is resistant to rifampin and penicillin,” according to the Texas health alert.

“Through investigation by DSHS, the most probable source of the infection was determined to be raw cow’s milk which the person had been consuming. The source of the milk was K-Bar Dairy.”

To read more about raw milk, click on the image.

Standing warning against raw milk
The Texas health department is on record with a standing warning about the dangers of unpasteurized, or so-called raw milk, products, as are most other local, state and federal public health agencies. Pasteurization, which involves heating milk, kills microscopic organisms in milk that can cause serious infections in people.

“This raw, unpasteurized milk can carry dangerous bacteria such as Brucella, Listeria, Salmonella, E. coli, and Campylobacter, which are responsible for causing numerous foodborne illnesses and outbreaks,” according to the Texas alert. “The Texas Department of State Health Services recommends that people drink and eat only pasteurized dairy products — including soft cheese, ice cream, and yogurt.

“This is especially important for people at higher risk for foodborne illness: children younger than 5, pregnant women, adults 65 and older, and people with weakened immune systems. However, healthy people of any age can get very sick or even die if they drink raw milk contaminated with harmful germs.”

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2fHcaiS

Saturday, August 12, 2017

Poultry products recalled over packaging mistake

Blaine, WA-based Luvo Inc. (USA) has recalled approximately 4,805 pounds of poultry products due to misbranding and undeclared allergens, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). The products are mislabeled as Chicken Chile Verde that contain milk and

The recalled products are mislabeled as Chicken Chile Verde that contain milk and soy but contain Turkey Meatloaf, which has additional allergens, eggs and fish (anchovies), that are not declared on the product label.

The products were produced on June 13, 2017. Subject to recall are:

  • 10 oz. retail cartons containing “LUVO Steam in Pouch A LITTLE SPICE CHICKEN CHILE VERDE with white chicken, black beans, and polenta” and lot code: 2018JUN13A, with a best before the date of June 13, 2018.

The products subject to recall bear establishment number “424” inside the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) mark of inspection. These items were shipped to distributors in California, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Wisconsin for further distribution.

The mistake was discovered after the firm received consumer complaints of the wrong meal inside the retail boxes. There have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about an injury or illness should contact a healthcare provider.

Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

FSIS routinely conducts recall effectiveness checks to verify recalling firms notify their customers of the recall and that steps are taken to make certain that the product is no longer available to consumers. When available, the retail distribution list will be posted on the FSIS website.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2uRBKDw

Raspberry mousse cakes recalled in Canada over norovirus

Friday, August 11, 2017

Papaya-related Salmonella victim count triples in 3 weeks

Editor’s note:  (To read FDA and CDC outbreak updates in Spanish, click on these links:)
Para leer las actualizaciones de brotes de FDA y CDC en español, haga clic en estos enlaces:
FDA http://ift.tt/2utpd9d
CDC http://ift.tt/2uHJHNf

The deadly Salmonella outbreak that has been traced to maradol papayas from Mexico is spreading, with 32 more victims confirmed in the past week and three more states reporting illnesses.

Recalls of three different brands of maradol papayas remain in effect by three fresh produce importers in the United States, as do warnings from federal and state officials urging everyone who has maradol papayas from Mexico to throw them out and clean thoroughly.

Nineteen states have reported lab-confirmed cases of Salmonella infections, with Illinois, Oklahoma and Texas being added to the list Friday in an outbreak update from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

More than two-thirds of the 141 victims for whom information is available are Hispanic.

Confirmed illnesses began May 17, with the most recent victim becoming sick on July 27, according to the CDC. One person in New York City died.

Complete information is not available on all 141 victims, but public health officials have confirmed one victim in New York City died. Of 103 victims with hospitalization information available, 45 of them, or 44 percent, had symptoms so severe they had to be admitted.

The other 16 states with confirmed cases of Salmonella Kiambu and Salmonella Thompson are: Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin.

The Food and Drug Administration has confirmed several types of Salmonella bacteria — including the outbreak strains of the Kiambu and Thompson varieties — on a number of different kinds of papaya from the Carica de Campeche farm in Mexico. Three specific brands of maradol variety papayas from that farm have been recalled:

  • Caribeña brand, distributed by Grande Produce of San Juan, TX;
  • Cavi brand, distributed by Agroson’s Produce of New York City; and
  • Valery brand, distributed by Freshtex Produce of Alamo, TX.

The CDC posted this photo with the outbreak notice, describing maradol papayas as large, oval fruits that weigh 3 or more pounds, with green skins that turn yellow when the fruit is ripe. The flesh inside the fruit is salmon-colored.” Photo courtesy of CDC

Additional brands could be recalled, according to federal officials, who are continuing to traceability efforts to determine what other distributors or importers may have bought papayas from the implicated farm.

“CDC recommends that consumers not eat, restaurants not serve, and retailers not sell maradol papayas from the Carica de Campeche farm in Mexico,” according to the CDC update.

“When in doubt, don’t eat, sell, or serve papayas; just throw them out. Wash and sanitize countertops as well as drawers or shelves in refrigerators where maradol papayas were stored.”

The FDA’s warning is even broader. It warns against eating, serving or selling any kind of papayas from the Carica de Campeche farm, which is in the southern state of Campeche, which borders Guatemala.

“Papayas from the Carica de Campeche farm tested positive for Salmonella Kiambu, Salmonella Thompson, Salmonella Agona, Salmonella Senftenberg, and Salmonella Gaminara,” the FDA reported.

“The Carica de Campeche farm has been added to Import Alert (IA) 99-35. …The FDA increased testing of papayas from Mexico in an effort to see if fruit from other farms could be contaminated. If the FDA finds Salmonella in other shipments, those farms will also be added to IA 99-35.”

The overall size of the ongoing outbreaks of infections from Salmonella Kiambu and Salmonella Thompson bacteria have tripled since the CDC’s initial announcement, which reported 47 victims as of July 21. Public health officials expect that number to continue to increase.

“Illnesses that occurred after July 14 might not be reported yet due to the time it takes between when a person becomes ill and when the illness is reported. This takes an average of two to four weeks,” according to the CDC.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2wRxC82

Thursday, August 10, 2017

Beef patties recalled for misbranding and undeclared allergen

Wisconsin’s Kenosha Beef International, LTD recalled approximately 3,960 pounds of beef patty products late Wednesday due to misbranding and an undeclared allergen, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

The products may contain milk, in the form of cheddar cheese, a known allergen that was not declared on the finished product label. The products also contain undeclared bacon.

The bacon cheddar beef patty products were produced on June 14, 2017.  Subject to the recall are:

  • 4-lb retail carton containing 12, 1/3 pound burgers of “JP O’REILLY’S, PUB BURGER, FAMILY PACK, MADE FROM BEEF CHUCK,” with a sell-by date of 01-10-18.
  • 24-lb cases of “JP O’REILLY’S, BACON & CHEDDAR BEEF PATTIES” with sell-by date of 01-10-18 and case codes of 0614KS42065, 0614KS42066, 0614KS42067, 0614KS42068 and 0614KS42070.

The recalled products subject to recall have establishment number “EST. 425B” printed adjacent to the sell-by date on the retail carton and inside the USDA mark of inspection on the shipping case. These items were shipped to retail locations in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania.

The mistake was discovered on Aug. 9, 2017 when the firm received two consumer complaints regarding the bacon cheddar beef patties not being labeled as bacon and cheddar. Specifically, the products were labeled as “JP O’Reilly’s PUB BURGER,” but contained “JP O’Reilly’s Bacon Cheddar Beef Patties.”

There have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to consumption of these products. Anyone concerned about an injury or illness should contact a healthcare provider.

Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them. These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.

FSIS routinely conducts recall effectiveness checks to verify recalling firms notify their customers of the recall and that steps are taken to make certain that the product is no longer available to consumers. When available, the retail distribution list(s) will be posted on the FSIS website.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2wLWnCt

Tuesday, August 8, 2017

Comfy Cow ice cream recalled because of E. coli and coliform

Kentucky-based Comfy Cow is recalling pints of ice cream after product testing showed several flavors were positive for E. coli bacteria or had high counts of coliform bacteria.

The recalled ice cream is packaged in pint containers and was sold primarily in retail stores in Kentucky, Missouri, Indiana and Tennessee, according to the recall notice posted Tuesday on the Food and Drug Administration’s website.

“On July 19 the firm was notified through internal firm product sample testing that pints of Banana Puddin Y’all, Chocolate Squared2, Cookies and Cream, Cow Trax, Double Fold Vanilla, Georgia Butter Pecan, Intense Dark Chocolate, Salted Caramel, Strawberry Fields Forever were either positive for E. coli or showed high counts of coliform,” according to the recall notice.

Coliform is used as an indicator of post-pasteurization contamination.

The Aug. 8 recall noted that the products were distributed between June 13 and July 21. No illnesses had been confirmed in connection with the recalled Comfy Cow branded ice cream as of the posting of the notice.

There is concern that consumers may have unused portions of the recalled ice cream in their homes.

Consumers are urged to use the following packaging information to determine if they have any of the recalled product:

  • Comfy Cow “Banana Puddin Ya’ll” in 473 mL pints with a Use By date of “04/07/2018” and a UPC number of 852009005353;
  • Comfy Cow “Chocolate Squared2” in 473 mL pints with a Use By date of “03/30/3018” and a UPC number of 852009005261;
  • Comfy Cow “Cookies and Cream” in 473 mL pints with a Use By date of “03/31/2018” and a UPC number of 852009005049;
  • Comfy Cow “Cow Trax” in 473 mL pints with a Use By date of “04/04/2018” and a UPC number of 852009005032;
  • Comfy Cow “Double Fold Vanilla” in 473 mL pints with a Use By date of “03/31/2018” and a UPC number of 852009005315;
  • Comfy Cow “Geogria Butter Pecan” in 473 mL pints with a Use By Date of “03/14/2018” and a UPC number of 852009005285;
  • Comfy Cow “Georgia Butter Pecan” in 3 gal bulk container with a Use By date of “03/14/2018” UPC number n/a;
  • Comfy Cow “Intense Dark Chocolate” in 473 mL pints with a Use By date of “03/23/2018” and a UPC number of 852009005148;
  • Comfy Cow “Salted Caramel” in 473 mL pints with a Use By date of “04/13/2018” and a UPC number of 852009005216; and
  • Comfy Cow “Strawberry Field Forever” in 473 mL pints with a Use By date of “03/21/18” and a UPC number of 852009005308.

Consumers who have purchased these products are urged to return them to the place of purchase for a full refund or discard the produce immediately.

Food contaminated with E. coli may not look or smell spoiled but can still make you sick. Symptoms can include nausea, vomiting, mild to severe abdominal cramps and watery to bloody diarrhea. In severe cases of illness, some people may have seizures or strokes, need blood transfusions and kidney dialysis or live with permanent kidney damage. In severe cases of illness, people may die.

Anyone who has eaten any of the recalled ice cream and developed symptoms of E. coli infection should seek medical attention and tell their doctors about the possible exposure so the proper diagnostic tests can be performed.

Consumers with more questions can contact the Comfy Cow production facility at 502-384-2556.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2hHDQEJ

Good Food Concepts recalls beef because of E. coli O26

Good Food Concepts LLC is recalling almost 1,300 pounds of beef from unidentified retail locations, wholesale locations and restaurants in Colorado Springs, CO, after company tests showed E. coli O26 contamination.

The Colorado Springs, CO, food distributor notified in-house government inspectors of the positive test results on Monday and the recall notice was posted by the USDA’s Recalls and Public Health Alerts as a Class I Recall, categorized with “high” health risk.

“The raw intact and non-intact beef items were processed and packaged on Aug 3 and Aug 4,” according to the recall notice. “These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase.”

“The products subject to recall bear establishment number ‘EST. 27316’ inside the USDA mark of inspection. These items were shipped to retail locations, wholesale locations, and restaurants in Colorado Springs, CO.”

Anyone who has eaten any of the recalled beef and developed symptoms of E. coli infection should seek medical attention and tell their doctors about the possible exposure so the proper diagnostic tests can be performed.

Symptoms usually begin two to eight days after exposure and can include dehydration, bloody diarrhea and abdominal cramps, according to the recall notice.

While most people recover within a week, some develop a type of kidney failure called hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). This condition can occur among people of any age, but is most common in children under 5 years old,  older adults and people with suppressed immune systems. It is marked by easy bruising, pallor, and decreased urine output. Persons who experience these symptoms should seek emergency medical care immediately.

Consumers with questions regarding the recall can contact David Anderson at 719-322-5945.

The 1,290 pounds of recalled raw intact and non-intact beef products can be identified by the following label information:

  • Various weights of individual packages of “CALLICRATE BEEF, Celebrate goodness, Celebrate life, Filet Mignon,” with lot code 170731CC;
  • Various weights of individual packages of “CALLICRATE BEEF, Celebrate goodness, Celebrate life, Brisket Flat,” with lot code 170731CC;
  • Various weights of individual packages of “CALLICRATE BEEF, Celebrate goodness, Celebrate life, Sirloin Tip,” with lot code 170731CC;
  • Various weights of individual packages of “CALLICRATE BEEF, Celebrate goodness, Celebrate life, Ribeye,” with lot code 170731CC;
  • Various weights of individual packages of “CALLICRATE BEEF, Celebrate goodness, Celebrate life, Stew Meat,” with lot code 170731CC;
  • Various weights of individual packages of “CALLICRATE BEEF, Celebrate goodness, Celebrate life, New York Strip,” with lot code 170731CC;
  • Various weights of individual packages of “CALLICRATE BEEF, Celebrate goodness, Celebrate life, Skirt Steak,” with lot code 170731CC; and
  • Various weights of individual packages of “CALLICRATE BEEF, Celebrate goodness, Celebrate life, Top Sirloin,” with lot code 170731CC.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2fpYLeJ

Monday, August 7, 2017

Third importer recalls Mexican papayas in Salmonella outbreak

A third produce importer in the U.S. is recalling whole, fresh maradol papayas grown and packed by Carica de Campeche in Mexico because a deadly, ongoing Salmonella outbreak has been traced to papayas from the farm.

Freshtex Produce LLC of Alamo, TX, posted its recall of “Valery” brand maradol papayas from the farm in Southern Mexico on Monday. Freshtex Produce distributed the recalled papayas to customers in Illinois from July 10 through 13.

“However, the product may have been further distributed outside the state of Illinois,” according to the recall notice on the Food and Drug Administration’s website.

Grande Produce of San Juan, TX, and Agroson’s Produce of New York City already recalled whole, fresh maradol papayas from the Carica de Campeche farm in Southern Mexico.

Although no illnesses had been confirmed in relation to the Valery brand of maradol papayas as of Monday, there are 109 people across 16 states who have been confirmed with Salmonella infections, according to a Monday update from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Among the 76 outbreak victims for whom information is available, there is a 46 percent hospitalization rate, with 35 victims having experienced symptoms so severe they had to be admitted. One person in New York City died.

Additional victims are expected to be identified because people who became ill after July 10 might not yet be included in the CDC’s numbers because of the time it takes between when a person becomes ill and when the illness is reported. This takes an average of two to four weeks, according to the CDC.

The CDC is recommending that consumers should not eat — and restaurants and retailers should not sell — maradol papayas from any suppliers in Mexico until further notice.

The FDA was more specific in its outbreak update on Monday evening.

“The FDA is now advising that consumers avoid Caribeña, Cavi and Valery brands of maradol papayas, and all varieties of papayas from the Carica de Campeche farm located in Campeche, Mexico, as a result of the FDA’s traceback investigation and testing,” according to the agency’s Monday outbreak update.

“The FDA is working to identify additional brand(s) that these papayas are sold under and facilitate recall(s). Meanwhile, consumers should ask their retailers about the source of their papayas.”

The fresh papayas recalled by Freshtex Produce can be identified by the Valery name on the box and labels that say grown and packed by Carica de Campeche. Freshtex Produce has ceased importing papayas from the grower, “and is taking all precautionary measures to ensure the safety of its imported produce,” according to the recall notice.

“Consumers who may have purchased the Valery brand papayas are advised to dispose of them. Consumers with questions may contact Freshtex Produce at 956-322-4817.”

Advice to consumers, restaurants and retailers
State and federal public health officials recommend applying the golden rule of food safety regarding papayas on hand in homes and businesses — when in doubt, throw it out.

Additional recommendations from CDC include:

  • If you have had whole, fresh papayas in your home or business, wash and sanitize countertops, cutting boards and utensils, as well as drawers or shelves in refrigerators where papayas were stored, with a solution of one tablespoon of chlorine bleach to one gallon of hot water; dry with a clean cloth or new paper towel.
  • Wash your hands with running water and soap following the cleaning and sanitation process.

The CDC posted this photo with the outbreak notice, describing maradol papayas as large, oval fruits that weigh 3 or more pounds, with green skins that turn yellow when the fruit is ripe. The flesh inside the fruit is salmon-colored.” Photo courtesy of CDC

Anyone who has eaten fresh papaya recently and developed symptoms of Salmonella infection is urged to seek medical attention and tell their doctors about the possible exposure so the proper diagnostic tests can be performed.

Salmonella bacteria can cause diarrhea, vomiting, stomach pain and fever.

Symptoms usually begin between 12 to 36 hours after exposure, but they may begin as early as 6 hours or as late as 72 hours after exposure.

Symptoms can be mild or severe and commonly last for two to seven days. Salmonella can infect anyone, but young children, older adults and people with weakened immune systems are the most likely to have severe infections.

Investigation details
The FDA has been working with state officials and the CDC to investigate the ongoing outbreak, which was first identified by Maryland public health staff investigating a cluster of Salmonella Kiambu illnesses.

Grande Produce of San Juan, TX, recalled Caribeña brand maradol papayas it distributed in Maryland and other states after people confirmed with Salmonella infections reported eating the fruit before they became ill. Lab tests conducted by Maryland officials confirmed the outbreak strain of Salmonella on Caribeña brand maradol papayas collected from a grocery store in Baltimore and from sick people’s homes.

Friday morning FDA named the Carica de Campeche farm in Mexico as the source of several brands of papayas, including those distributed by Grande Produce and Agroson’s, that tested positive for Salmonella.

“Papayas from the Carica de Campeche farm tested positive for Salmonella Kiambu, Salmonella Thompson, Salmonella Agona, Salmonella Senftenberg, and Salmonella Gaminara,” FDA reported Friday morning.

Editor’s note: Because of the popularity of papayas in Mexican and Hispanic cuisine, public health officials say people in those groups are at particular risk during the current outbreak. As of Monday, for the 74 outbreak victims for whom ethnicity information was available, 50, or 68 percent, are Hispanic. To access Spanish versions of information the CDC and FDA have posted about the outbreak and recalls, please use the following links:

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2fos2Xi

Dutch egg recall for insecticide contamination spans the globe

Dutch egg producers’ practice of mixing the toxic insecticide Fipronil with a cleaning agent and sanitizer known as “Dega 16” for use around chickens has apparently led to the world’s largest recall of shell eggs since 2010.

The first Fipronil-contaminated eggs were reported July 20 by food safety authorities in Belgium. The insecticide-tainted eggs turned up in the Netherlands two days later. Then there was a delay of several days before the Dutch egg producers acknowledged that millions of the Fipronil-contaminated eggs had been shipped throughout Germany. Millions of eggs, the exact number is not known, are being recalled by all three countries.

Other countries around the world are on guard because of the Dutch egg scandal.

The Food Standards Agency in the United Kingdom reports “a very small number of eggs have been distributed to the UK from the farms affected.” It says the UK does not permit Fipronil as a veterinary medicine or pesticide and it may not be used around food producing animals.

“The government has already taken action to prevent any risk to UK consumers by adding Fipronil to its robust surveillance program in UK farms. We have no evidence that eggs laid in the UK are contaminated or that Fipronil has been used inappropriately in the UK,” according to FSA’s statement on the egg crisis.

“85 percent of the eggs we consume in the UK are laid here. The number of eggs involved represents about 0.0001 percent of the eggs imported into the UK each year. Our risk assessment, based on all the information available, indicates that as part of a normal healthy diet this low level of potential exposure is unlikely to be a risk to public health and there is no need for consumers to be concerned. Our advice is that there is no need for people to change the way they consume or cook eggs or products containing eggs.”

In Asia, the Center for Food Safety in Hong Kong is cautioning the public against using the Dutch eggs, and it has ordered retailers to stop selling them.

Food safety officials in Hong Kong posted this photo of Dutch eggs they ordered pulled from retail shelves. The Cheer Fresh Dutch Brown Eggs have the code 2-NL 4378101 and a best-before date of Nov. 6.

“Based on the levels of pesticide residue detected in the samples, adverse health effect(s) will not be caused under usual consumption,” according to the Hong Kong center’s Aug. 4 statement. “However, for the sake of prudence, members of the public who have bought the affected batch of the products should stop consuming it.

“The CFS has taken a precautionary measure with effect from today that all eggs imported from the Netherlands will be held for testing and will only be released to the market for sale upon satisfactory test results.”

The Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA) has told receiving areas that the pesticide Fipronil was detected in certain eggs at levels that might cause adverse effects and consumption of the affected eggs was not advised. The Center for Food Safety in Hong Kong, using information and egg codes supplied by NVWA, did its own tests on two samples of eggs. Both samples were positive for Fipronil, at levels of 0.064 parts per million (ppm) and 0.055 ppm, respectively. The maximum level permitted in Hong Kong is 0.02 ppm.

Because of those results, CFS has had the eggs removed from shelves and ordered the importer, Dah Chong Hong Limited, to initiate a recall.

Fipronil was found in sufficient levels to cause 180 poultry farms in the Netherlands to be closed. Enough insecticide was found on another 59 Dutch farms for their eggs to require health warnings for children.

The recall efforts are being assisted by Europe’s practice of requiring numbering of each shell egg. German grocery stores are both recalling the eggs and promising customers that they are not selling any Dutch eggs.

German officials are upset over the delay in the Netherlands releasing producer names and numbers that are involved. German Agriculture Minister Christian Schmidt has called on Belgium and Netherlands to pursue whoever had “criminal intent to contaminate” the eggs with a banned product.

Fipronil is allowed for use on fleas, mites, ticks, and other similar insects. The World Health Organization (WHO) says the toxic substance can damage the liver, kidneys, and thyroid gland, but only if ingested in large amounts.

While the exact numbers have not been disclosed, the Dutch egg recall is the largest since 2010 when 550 million eggs were recalled in the United States for Salmonella contamination linked to two Iowa egg farms.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)

 



from Food Recalls – Food Safety News http://ift.tt/2fobfnu